Good move.

Well, a better move would have been to actually sign him I think.

Chiefs still thin at DE.
[Reply]

Your passive aggressiveness and false bravado this offseason is hilarious.
[Reply]

Fuck.

So much for the theory that he was just avoiding as much of preseason as he could.
[Reply]

Dude fuckin sucks and is washed since he didn’t sign here
[Reply]

Er NEWSFLASH!!..Clowney got nine sacks last season which is as much as Ingram has got in THE LAST THREE SEASONS!!..so your last statement is simply garbage..fullstop.
[Reply]

Veach failed with the pass rush. Unless one of our second year guys kills it we will not get much pressure.
[Reply]

That's fine if you think sacks are the only measure of competence. Anybody who saw our defence last year before and after Ingram, and also watched him play, would have to be blind to not see the impact.
[Reply]

He didn’t really take any swings. Even when there were opportunities. He could’ve signed Ingram I’m sure.

Makes me think that there is a trade in the works. Robert Quinn seems to be the popular name.
[Reply]

You can’t fix everything in one offseason. This secondary was a disaster last year.

Matheiu and Sorenson got old and slow, Thornhill got benched, Hughes sucked, Baker sucked and we lost Ward.

Thank God we were able to use resources to fix that and add Karlaftis/Chenab due to the Tyreek trade. Best thing we can do now add a vet DE.
[Reply]

You can sugar-coat it all you like..the facts are the facts. He got two sacks in KC..if you think he was prime Derrick Thomas here then go ahead buddy :-)
[Reply]

I think DJLN probably called it right. The Chiefs are betting on Frank Clark.
[Reply]

Ingram was good for us near the end of the season but who knows if he would have held up all year playing a lot of snaps
[Reply]

Justin Houston be the backup plan ?
[Reply]

I wonder if the staff has high expectations for Karlaftis, Kaindoh, and Herring
[Reply]

His motivation was moolah
[Reply]