Originally Posted by :
Plot and character details have still been kept tightly under wraps, until now. The Illuminerdi can exclusively reveal the roles of Mads Mikkelsen and Shaunette Renée Wilson. And on top of that, when the next installment of the Indiana Jones franchise will take place.
According to our sources, Mads Mikkelsen will be playing the villain in this new installment of Indiana Jones. His character is described to us as a Nazi scientist enlisted into NASA by the United States government to work on the space agency’s moon landing initiative.
Shaunette Renee Wilson will be playing Mads Mikkelsen’s villain’s CIA handler responsible for “babysitting” the Nazi scientist turned NASA recruit. There will also be a female villain, “an evil and brutal killer” who will work with Mads Mikkelsen’s character. According to our sources, Scarlett Johansson actually passed on this role previously.
Mads Mikkelsen’s character’s description not only reveals that he will be the villain of Indiana Jones 5, but when the franchise’s next installment will be taking place.
The next Indiana Jones adventure would logically be set during the 1960s space race. NASA’s Apollo 11 landed on the moon in 1969, so it wouldn’t be a shock for the film to be set later in the 1960s, especially since the fourth Indiana Jones film was set in 1957. And in classic Indiana Jones fashion it looks like our hat wearing, whip wielding, archeologist will have another chance to punch some Nazis, with Mikkelsen’s villain being a former scientist for Hitler’s Reich.
Even the bad reviews are giving it at least an average score right now.
This is going to be a 90% crowd score on RT. And you dipshits are just going to convince yourselves it sucks so you don't look like idiots. Which you do anyway. [Reply]
:-) It genuinely makes me laugh knowing what poor Clay is in store for, now knowing that the plot leaks are accurate. Poor guy is gonna have a BAD time. [Reply]
Son shot and killed offscreen. Unhappily divorced. Goes on an adventure where he's repeatedly berated by his goddaughter until he ends up dying with a gunshot and concussion, still miserable and depressed* getting punched in the face by goddaughter and magically brought back to his present where it's unexplained how any of it happened since it completely breaks the rules the film set about the dial but at least he's not unhappily divorced and at least gets a semblance of a happy ending.
* Was the original ending of the movie until Iger furiously forced KK to change it
Originally Posted by Hammock Parties:
"Cuties" is at 87% on RT. Why don't you go watch that?
What’s the audience score on that? If 60% is the ceiling from critics, what will audience scores, which are usually more reliable, come in at? 20%? [Reply]
It's not like we wanted Indiana Jones to be shit, but it just is. I'm not even blaming Mangold here (God damn Logan was great). He's probably just doing exactly what the suits are telling him to do. [Reply]
Originally Posted by BigBeauford:
It's not like we wanted Indiana Jones to be shit, but it just is. I'm not even blaming Mangold here (God damn Logan was great). He's probably just doing exactly what the suits are telling him to do.
can a thing be shit if more people like it than hate it, and the people that hate it are elitist film snobs? [Reply]
