ChiefsPlanet Mobile
Page 2 of 3
< 12 3 >
Washington DC and The Holy Land>Things that Democrats have funded that cost more than a border wall.
Pogue 12:18 PM 01-10-2019
Originally Posted by :
Below are some examples of wasteful federal spending projects that individually cost more than the proposed border wall (data courtesy of Citizens Against Government Waste):

“Rural Utility Service.” This program costs taxpayers $8.2 billion/year and has no actual purpose after its original intent — bringing electricity to rural communities — was long ago achieved. It’s now being used to bring broadband access to small communities (usually with populations of less than 20,000). However there’s no indication the “beneficiaries” of this expensive government agency actually appreciate the program, and the majority of its projects are not completed on time or within budget.


Sugar Subsidies. America, as Democrats frequently intone, faces a health crisis. What they don’t tell us is that it’s largely of their own making, as Congress subsidizes the production of unhealthy foods like sugar and high-fructose corn syrup. Eliminating sugar subsidies alone would save $6 billion, enough to fund the border wall; it would also have the added benefit of helping curb the nation’s obesity epidemic.


Community Development Grants. These grants were created in the 70s to revitalize failing American cities. The program has almost always been plagued with dysfunction, with grants going to wealthy communities and other recipients failing to produce “accountability and results.” Citizens Against Government Waste reports that even President Obama called for reining in the program. It’s elimination would save $15 billion over 5 years.


The United Nations. As the United Nation’s largest contributor, the U.S. in 2016 donated $10 billion to the U.N. As CAGW notes, reducing these contributions just 25 percent would create a savings of $12.5 billion over 10 years. Of the money Congress appropriates for the United Nations, $5 million taxpayer dollars are itemized for abortions in foreign countries.

Amtrak. Congress could sell Amtrak to the private sector where it would almost certainly be operated more efficiently, but instead it’s showered in billions of dollars of taxpayer subsidies. Over the next five years, these subsidies will cost $9.7 billion.

Unused Real Estate. Congress appropriates money to maintain federal real estate that’s not actually being used. Per CAGW, an October 31, 2017, CRS report found that, “In FY2016, federal agencies owned 3,120 buildings that were vacant (unutilized), and another 7,859 that were partially empty (underutilized).” Current laws require the government to undergo a series of steps before considering a sale of these buildings. Were selling this unused property prioritized, the 5-year savings are estimated at $15 billion. Simply maintaining the unused buildings annually costs $1.7 billion.

Foreign Aid. American taxpayers currently spend more than $50 billion a year helping develop foreign countries. Many of the recipients are not known for being America’s closest allies — such as Egypt, South Sudan, Uganda, South Africa, Russia, the Congo, Sudan, and Zambia — which raises the question of what Americans are receiving in exchange for all of this aid. Cutting these donations back just 10 percent would be enough to fund the wall.

Waste, Fraud, and Abuse. The Government Accountability Office estimates taxpayers are spending more than $137 billion annually on “payment errors,” which covers all manner of waste, fraud, and abuse within Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. The feds could implement the same kind of fraud protections credit card companies used to ensure against abuse, but don’t. In fact, Congress has gone in the opposite direction, winding down the program intended to police fraud within Medicare, the so-called Recovery Audit Contractor. In other words, Congress is knowingly funding tens of billions of dollars of fraud annually.
https://news.grabien.com/story-thing...re-border-wall
[Reply]
True North 02:16 PM 01-10-2019
It is funny how left is so anti-Russian and pro interventionist these days. Just wetting their collectivist fingers and going wherever the political breeze takes them i guess.
[Reply]
Randallflagg 06:06 PM 01-10-2019
Originally Posted by Prison Bitch:
We are still waiting for them to share their “border security” plan that’s also moral. Should be any month now.

Hey.....


They have an outstanding plan for "border security" - Get rid of borders completely. Yet, they wonder why the American people call them fools.......... :-)
[Reply]
Prison Bitch 06:59 PM 01-10-2019
Originally Posted by Randallflagg:
Hey.....


They have an outstanding plan for "border security" - Get rid of borders completely. Yet, they wonder why the American people call them fools.......... :-)
That’s exactly what they favor. So why keep up the charade, they should just admit it publicly
[Reply]
RodeoPants2 07:10 PM 01-10-2019
which democrats have 100% open borders as their policy position on immigration?
[Reply]
NinerDoug 07:10 PM 01-10-2019
Let's be honest. It ain't the $5 Billion. It's not giving Trump what he campaigned on. It's not giving him a victory.

At the end of the day, if he couldn't get the money out of a Republican controlled Congress, not sure why anyone would expect a Democratic controlled House to give it to him.
[Reply]
Pogue 07:24 PM 01-10-2019
Originally Posted by RodeoPants2:
which democrats have 100% open borders as their policy position on immigration?
The ones that advocate sanctuary laws.
[Reply]
RodeoPants2 11:25 PM 01-10-2019
lol wrong
[Reply]
LiveSteam 11:46 PM 01-10-2019
Lib= communist
Whataboutism= tap out
[Reply]
VAChief 07:10 AM 01-11-2019
Originally Posted by NinerDoug:
Let's be honest. It ain't the $5 Billion. It's not giving Trump what he campaigned on. It's not giving him a victory.

At the end of the day, if he couldn't get the money out of a Republican controlled Congress, not sure why anyone would expect a Democratic controlled House to give it to him.
I'm not sure why this isn't asked every time he addresses the press. How is this an emergency now that he has a split congress, but when he could get virtually anything passed he didn't see it as a pressing need. He has been spouting it as a crisis repeatedly since he descended from his golden perch.
[Reply]
BDj23 11:24 AM 01-11-2019
Originally Posted by RodeoPants2:
which democrats have 100% open borders as their policy position on immigration?
Might as well do away with borders when you guys propose amnesty and a path to citizenship every time a couple million of em sneak across the border.
[Reply]
NinerDoug 11:30 AM 01-11-2019
Originally Posted by BDj23:
Might as well do away with borders when you guys propose amnesty and a path to citizenship every time a couple million of em sneak across the border.
I’m wondering if the “they take jobs from teenagers” is still a thing. My sister in law who lives on the outskirts of Austin was telling me that the local fast food places pay $14 an hour, because they can’t fill their positions otherwise. Teenagers are too busy doing homework until 1:00 or 2:00 am to have a job.
[Reply]
RodeoPants2 01:07 PM 01-11-2019
Hi! Have we identified any elected democrats with 100% open borders as their policy position on immigration?
[Reply]
NinerDoug 01:08 PM 01-11-2019
Originally Posted by RodeoPants2:
Hi! Have we identified any elected democrats with 100% open borders as their policy position on immigration?
Facts aren't always looked upon with approval around here. :-)
[Reply]
Discuss Thrower 01:11 PM 01-11-2019
Originally Posted by RodeoPants2:
Hi! Have we identified any elected democrats with 100% open borders as their policy position on immigration?
.

Originally Posted by Hillary Clinton:
"My dream is a hemispheric common market, with open trade and open borders"

[Reply]
Cosmos 01:55 PM 01-11-2019
Originally Posted by NinerDoug:
Let's be honest. It ain't the $5 Billion. It's not giving Trump what he campaigned on. It's not giving him a victory.

At the end of the day, if he couldn't get the money out of a Republican controlled Congress, not sure why anyone would expect a Democratic controlled House to give it to him.
What WAS important is to pass a Trillion $ tax giveaway to corporations and the top 1%.

Where was the funding for a border wall then? Wasn’t important then?

You had the House/Senate/Presidency To get it done....

Was it because everyone was waiting for Mexico to pay for it ?
[Reply]
Page 2 of 3
< 12 3 >
Up