Originally Posted by -King-:
He is credited with them. But I credit him with that pass rush at the end much more than what he did on the sack. Because that was pure skill and talent he used on that rush whereas on the sack he was unblocked on a 5 second play. Even you could have made that sack. I know you can tell the difference between the two. But yeah, he still gets to tally that sack on his stat sheet.
He wasn't 'unblocked,' he wasn't even rushing; the subsequent circumstances of the play as it unfolded gave him the opportunity to attempt to rush and ultimately get a sack. From any reasonable perspective, Frank was playing some kind of contain there.
Only an idiot would conclude that was just "unblocked" and luckily got a sack. you really think he was just standing there in front of that OL (or whoever that was), because he wasn't interested in rushing the passer for about 5 seconds? [Reply]
Originally Posted by DTVietnam:
Aside from play on the field its his attitude. . him and The Landlord have really made this a tough defense. .their "Championship swagger" is contagious
Frank gets into peoples heads..
this team doesnt seemed focused on personal stats..they play for each other..and thats why we win
Mahomes said Championship swagger twice in todays postgame presser:
No offense...but wtf does that even mean? So he doesn't get sacks because that's a personal stat and he only cares about the team? Like he could get sacks, but he chooses not to? [Reply]
Originally Posted by Megatron96:
He wasn't 'unblocked,' he wasn't even rushing; the subsequent circumstances of the play as it unfolded gave him the opportunity to attempt to rush and ultimately get a sack. From any reasonable perspective, Frank was playing some kind of contain there.
Only an idiot would conclude that was just "unblocked" and luckily got a sack. you really think he was just standing there in front of that OL (or whoever that was), because he wasn't interested in rushing the passer for about 5 seconds?
Was he blocked?
No.
What's the opposite of blocked? Jeez you outsmart yourself sometimes. [Reply]
Originally Posted by staylor26:
So does it not count?
Why do we only do this with Clark? Have those of you that have been sucking Houston’s dick in this thread gone back and taken away all his coverage sacks?
Originally Posted by -King-:
No offense...but wtf does that even mean? So he doesn't get sacks because that's a personal stat and he only cares about the team? Like he could get sacks, but he chooses not to?
Sacks are important but so is containment, drawing double teams. . etc. .
of course id like to see him with 20 sacks but I think there are other things he brings to the team ...
I trust him for this playoff run. . thats all that really matters.. .
we're 14-1 and have played some bad offensive games this year [Reply]
Originally Posted by Megatron96:
"bECaUSe hE GEtS pAId A bIlLIOn DOLlArS/wEeQ!"
And he's not Chris Jones. And we like Crhis Jones because he invented SackNation. Or some shit.
We like Chris Jones because he had multiple consecutive seasons regardless of scheme or coaching staff in which he is/was always in the backfield making plays. Not because of whatever sacknation shit.
Also his dick fell out of his shorts. That’s the other reason [Reply]
