remember last month when libshits were going on about March 6th being some big date that "qanons" were going to have some sort of gathering because that's what the TV said?


Now they are saying in May there's going to be some "qanon convention"


lol, funny how not a single person who's followed this shit has ever heard about it....


I already know the responses "hurrrrr, qanon lul cultists haha drrrr"


You guys are going to keep watching your TV and believe people that don't believe the TV are stupid. It's the most obvious propaganda in the history of the world and you all will always keep falling for it. That's something that will never change.
[Reply]

Do you watch TV?

Also, if I may, who are you attributing your first quote to in that other post you posted to the post I posted in response to your original post?
[Reply]

There are a whole bunch of Q quacks here...that can’t find the courage to come out of hiding and acknowledge how easily they’ve been duped, to believe in a loony storyline like Quanon.

Republicans, Ultra Evangelicals and QTards....that’s a whole lotta crazy, truth and facts be damned.
[Reply]

via GIPHY

It's the *TV* that makes us think you're stupid.

The fact that you morons keep posting what you believe in a two year old thread with over 1800 replies called, (checks notes), "Qanon posts here" that DOESN'T make us think you're stupid.
[Reply]

Im a republican as are most of the buddies I hang out with> none of us believe in the QAnon BS. in fact I think the percent of right leaning folks that do believe that nonsense has got to be extremely small. This thread should just be renamed the Bump likes Q thread. what a waste of bandwidth
[Reply]

I read this 3x and couldn’t decipher it.


Sick burn bro. At least you conceded my point on that matter.
[Reply]

Of course you didn't understand it. I literally lifted the language straight from the graphic you referenced. You didn't understand what the data in the graph said, so why (or how) could you possibly "decipher" a post that directly quotes something that you don't have the capacity to understand in the first place?

Are you and Bump mults?
[Reply]

You misread the chart. It doesn’t say 13% of HS level Democrats only watch leftwing sources. But rather, of the entire pool of Dems, only 13% of the “only left” folks were HS.


Hope that helps.
[Reply]

WTF is this bullshit happening in my thread.
[Reply]

You are reading that wrong. Add up the numbers in that column. 13+25+27+34=99

13% of the people who answered that they only watch left leaning sources are HS.

The chart doesn’t break up those questions “only left” “mixed” and “other” into percentages of the entire dem pool. Might be helpful if it did but it doesn’t.
[Reply]

Agreed on all your points. Why did you post this to me? You’re just restating my argument unless I’m not following.
[Reply]

Mainly to correct where you said it was of the “entire pool of Dems”
[Reply]

The bottom half is the Dem pool.
[Reply]

Yes, but not broken down into pct who answered each q about news sources, which is what your statement said.
[Reply]

Actually: It’s broken down by % too.

All 4 categories show their contribution to the total. For both groups.
[Reply]