Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501:
I was told for months that it was the chiefs master plan not to pursue a WR1 and for the best qb in the game to carry lesser talent
I am not in favor of adding an overpriced aging vet to replace an in his prime superstar that we would not pay (for the record I believe not paying Hill was the right decision). However, if the Chiefs did decide to go this route I would prefer Odell over DHop for the simple reason that it would not cost a draft pick. [Reply]
If the deal is reasonable and incentive based, I don’t hate it. It adds juice without costing a draft pick. Chiefs would have to be able to protect themselves.
I can buy the idea that the second ACL was related to a “bad surgery.” Kind of.
As with most moves, I’d have to see it in totality before really judging. [Reply]