I'd love to come out of the draft with a LT of the future. I do feel like there were a number of times that PM2 had plenty of time in the pocket and just couldn't find anywhere to go with the ball, so I'd also love a WR who can consistently create separation. That's not too much to ask, right? [Reply]
I get it, but PFF grades mean nothing. I am not one of those who likes it when it’s positive for a Chiefs player and against it when it’s negative. I take their evaluations with a grain of salt. Taylor got better as the season progressed and the NFL stopped directly targeting him. [Reply]
Originally Posted by nychief:
There isn't going to be an impact starting tackle available at 32... doesn't mean we won't draft OLine there, but I wouldn't hold my breath for an LT that can step right in. Still think we sign a vet.
I would be curious who. KC was fortunate that Smith who needed a rebound season was available. [Reply]
Just grab your top guy at position or need WR /OT/DT if we lose Jones it migh be DT if someone falls sick n e it looks like we can add WR as good ir. Enter than round in RD 2 [Reply]
There's one of two things that will happen for us this draft:
1) One of the elite WR falls to us
2) There is a run of receivers in the first and a talent that is usually drafted in the 11-20 range falls to us at 32
This draft couldn't be set up any better for us to grab a player we typically don't available at the end of the first. [Reply]
Originally Posted by nychief:
There isn't going to be an impact starting tackle available at 32... doesn't mean we won't draft OLine there, but I wouldn't hold my breath for an LT that can step right in. Still think we sign a vet.
Originally Posted by ntexascardfan:
There's one of two things that will happen for us this draft:
1) One of the elite WR falls to us
2) There is a run of receivers in the first and a talent that is usually drafted in the 11-20 range falls to us at 32
This draft couldn't be set up any better for us to grab a player we typically don't available at the end of the first.
Hopefully we don't go off the board and take a WR of lesser talent at the end of the 1st.
Originally Posted by MahomesMagic:
Hopefully we don't go off the board and take a WR of lesser talent at the end of the 1st.
Don't want a CEH this year.
CEH wasn’t a good pick, but I don’t disagree with the philosophy behind it.
The Chiefs zigged when the rest of the league zagged.
They picked their highest rated player at a position of need when no other team picked that same position. They were able to have their pick of any RB.
Now clearly, the Chiefs failed in their evaluation of that player somewhere (or maybe the injuries just ruined what could have been), but I don’t blame the Chiefs for their thought process on that pick. [Reply]
Originally Posted by smithandrew051:
CEH wasn’t a good pick, but I don’t disagree with the philosophy behind it.
The Chiefs zigged when the rest of the league zagged.
They picked their highest rated player at a position of need when no other team picked that same position. They were able to have their pick of any RB.
Now clearly, the Chiefs failed in their evaluation of that player somewhere (or maybe the injuries just ruined what could have been), but I don’t blame the Chiefs for their thought process on that pick.
Was just dumb.
If you want a polished system fit RB do that at the end of the 2nd or beginning go the 3rd.
And let players like Michael Pittman, Tee Higgins, DeAndre Swift, and Jonathan Taylor go by them.
