Man, every time I watch this guy I can't help but think he would be fantastic in this offense. I know TE in the 1st isn't an option for many on here, and I doubt it happens, but he might be the best TE in this class and has the upside to be a top 3 TE in the NFL in a couple years.
Andy loves his YAC guys, and Kincaid is really fucking good after the catch. Kelce and Kincaid would be a cheat code in the middle of the field.
Of course, you could say the same thing about Mayer and Musgrave. Any one of the top 3 TEs would have the rest of the NFL collectively shitting their pants. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Dante84:
How is Mayer's fit with our offense? I ask because I was able to get him in a PFN mock, though I think he's gone in the late teens / early twenties.
I think he plays like Gronk in that he is just physically imposing and dominant with solid hands. I feel like its a different style than Kelce.
Do Andy/Patrick just prefer a guy who excels at getting separation that much more than a possession guy?
Originally Posted by duncan_idaho:
Zack Kuntz put on a show at the combine today. Just posted about it in the Combine thread on the main Lounge.
But... basically gives you Darnell Washington's advantage (size, speed, uncommon agility and speed for size) with better leaping ability and explosiveness, and has been used in a variety of ways as a pass game weapon.
Needs to work on his blocking, but otherwise a better fit for KC than someone like Washington.
This is the kind of 2nd day pick I'd rather see than a 1st rounder (or really even a 2nd) on a TE.
He's a little older so that will impact his growth curve in all probability. It will also probably push him into the late 3rd.
He's a tall dude, fast and agile. But he's green and he doesn't have a lot of runway in front of him. He wasn't super-productive in college and he'd definitely need to add some weight to be anything more than a Mikael Ricks sort of novelty item.
But that's what 3rd and 4th round picks are for, IMO. [Reply]
Ok, hands down, this IS the Kelce replacement at TE. I would be willing to make this selection my #1 priority no matter what the cost. He is incredible.
I just don't know where you draft him. Do you move down from 31 and take him near the top of the 2nd? Trade up from 63? He isn't going to make it to us at 63. [Reply]
Originally Posted by The Franchise:
If you want the Kelce replacement and are willing to wait a year or two for him to fully get there....it's this kid.
Kincaid moves MUCH more like Kelce imo. Musgrave could be incredible, but it is speed and size. It's not YAC or route running or finding soft spots or body control or really anything like Kelce. I think it's completely possible Musgrave ends up a better player because Kincaid isn't particularly athletic, but he plays much more like Kelce I reckon. [Reply]
Originally Posted by The Franchise:
I just don't know where you draft him. Do you move down from 31 and take him near the top of the 2nd? Trade up from 63? He isn't going to make it to us at 63.
Move up from 63? We have draft capital in the later rounds.... [Reply]
Sorry but when I watch both Musgrave and Kincaid highlights, well I see Kelce looking in the mirror and seeing Kincaid's reflection. I would move up in the draft to either 24 (Jacksonville) or 25 (Giants) or 26 (Cowboys) to snag this player. It would look good for KC, Clark should be happy and yada yada! Do it Veach! :-) [Reply]
