He just wants to feel wanted, maybe some bertosexual affection would do the trick.
[Reply]

And, maybe a player.
[Reply]

I'm happy with my team...but still can't get over "burtosexuality"...

Sent from my LM-X410(FG) using Tapatalk
[Reply]

QB J. Allen BUF
RB C. McCaffrey CAR
RB J. Jacobs LV
WR D. Hopkins ARZ
WR C. Claypool PIT
TE L. Thomas WAS
FL WR R. Anderson CAR
FL WR C. Davis NYJ
PK M. Prater ARZ
DF Miami

BN QB M. Ryan ATL
BN RB D. Singletary BUF
BN RB Z. Moss BUF
BN RB M. Carter NYJ
BN WR D. Chark Jr. JAX
BN TE N. Fant DEN

Feel good about everything except my RB depth. After my top 2, things get REAAAAAAAAAALLY dicey lol.
[Reply]

Because you over reached me for claypool instead of getting RB depth!
[Reply]

LOL... touche'

Honestly though, it was my in-draft-admitted fuck up of taking Robby Anderson. I was fully intent on taking Raheem Moster there and was thinking about Anderson the following turn and had put him in my queue...then I made amazing happen.
[Reply]

MY RB's get dicey BEFORE my top 2.......
[Reply]

Good of place as any.

I now have the #1 draft spot in my pay league (my last favorite spot to draft). Do I have choices? Feel like I HAVE to take mccaffrey. MAYBE I could take cook. But beyond that, it's crazy to think of anyone else isn't it?
[Reply]

I'm well known in my fantasy circles for going rb heavy, to the extreme.

What if I blew out conventional wisdom and my personal history and did something so far out....

Like draft kelce #1?

Is that insane?
[Reply]

Insane? Yes. Will it lose you a league? Probably not. I went full homer in my work league and took mahomes at 6 last year and made the championship.
[Reply]

Mccaffrey is projected to score 70 more points than the next highest scoring rb.

Kelce is projected to score 75 more points than the next highest scoring te.

Mahomes is projected to score 83 more points than the 3rd highest scoring qb (he's only projected 23 more than #2 so I had to change the comparison some)

Based on that data, my biggest jump from top to 2nd positional wise is kelce. So I should take him.

The difference between rb 1 and rb 12 is roughly the same as te 1 to te 12.

However, there are still viable rbs after 12 whereas tes after about 8 is shit.

Still leads me to kelce.

Biggest issue is there won't be top 20 rbs left in round 5 but there will be top 5 tes.

That suggests mccaffrey.


HELP ME!
[Reply]

Unrelated. A league I’ve been in for 3 years voted 5/8 to auto draft the whole league wtf..
[Reply]

I'm seriously debating it. Also I've thought about mahomes at 1 even. Madness. I hate the first pick. I like to react in the first round. And then I hate the 20 pick wait because so much can happen.

Better be good at waiver wire then. Ick.
[Reply]

Mahomes is a crazy idea (IMO) as the EVOR at QB is negligible through rounds 4 or 5 and nominal through rounds 7 or 8.

If you think Davonte Adams repeats his 2020 season, from a net points and EVOR he makes sense as a top 3 pick and thus wouldn't be a reach at #1.

If you think Kelce repeats his 2020 season, that Waller won't be there at 20, and that other TEs not named Waller struggle equally again, his positional EVOR is justifiable as a top pick.
[Reply]

I did take mahomes with my first round pick (8) in my other free league. But it's a point per completion scoring system so top qbs can score 70+ points a week.

I think kelce repeats and Waller falls off some. I think the middle class of tes won't be quite so far off though.
[Reply]