Father in viral video of school board arrest says his daughter was raped in school bathroom.
On June 22, Scott Smith was arrested at a Loudoun County, Virginia, school board meeting, a meeting that was ultimately deemed an “unlawful assembly” after many attendees vocally opposed a policy on transgender students.
What people did not know is that weeks prior on May 28, Smith says, a boy allegedly wearing a skirt entered a girls’ bathroom at nearby Stone Bridge High School, where he sexually assaulted Smith’s ninth-grade daughter.
Juvenile records are sealed, but Smith’s attorney Elizabeth Lancaster told The Daily Wire that a boy was charged with two counts of forcible sodomy, one count of anal sodomy, and one count of forcible fellatio, related to an incident that day at that school.
As Loudoun schools sought to pass a controversial transgender policy in June, it concealed that a 9th-grade girl was allegedly raped by a "gender fluid" student in a school bathroom just 3 weeks prior, The Daily Wire has learned.https://t.co/t5IEv1vZZF
Originally Posted by Baby Lee:
When you do this, all you do is demonstrate for all how shaky the ground you know yourself to be on. Your urgency to change the subject is a tell.
It’s all he does. He’s the epitome of “bad faith”.
Like I’ve said, has Joe Bien not been accused of sexual assault? It’s all fucking bullshit. [Reply]
Originally Posted by NJChiefsFan27:
The bathrooms are still separated by gender, but gender is no longer being defined as rigidly as conservatives are used to.
Translation, we can't win on the merits of the argument so we are going to change the definitions of things.
Transgenderism is the employment of a useful fiction by people who suffer from gender dimorphism. You are not going to make the fiction go away by re-defining gender. [Reply]
Originally Posted by staylor26:
It’s all he does. He’s the epitome of “bad faith”.
Like I’ve said, has Joe Bien not been accused of sexual assault? It’s all fucking bullshit.
I try to be empathetic and extend an olive branch and they still take it as an attack.
At its most blunt and reductive, the phrase is 'big heart, small brain.'
I credit them with a genesis of their activism rooted in an impulse to be nice and do good. But they come up with emotional and ill-considered solutions. Then when people criticize THE EFFICICACY or OVERALL FAIRNESS of their ill-considered and emotional solutions, they immediate go to derision and resentment and accusations of bad faith, anything to blunt the reality that their solutions are all-too-often counterproductive and often destructive overall. [Reply]
Originally Posted by NJChiefsFan27:
Sorry trans people, we can't give you rights or treat you with human decency because a guy somewhere faked it once!
Forcing the rest of society to engage in a fiction they don't want to be a part of is an affront to human decency. [Reply]
Originally Posted by El Lobo Gordo:
Translation, we can win on the merits of the argument so we are going to change the definitions of things.
Transgenderism is the employment of a useful fiction by people who suffer from gender dimorphism. You are not going to make the fiction go away by re-defining gender.
It’s funny how he claims that somebody like me must not know the difference between sex and gender when it’s clear that he’s the fucking one that doesn’t know the difference.
Bathrooms have clearly always been segregated by biological sex, not by what one feels they are. [Reply]
Damn. 27 is going to have to empty the ice maker and load up on the preparation H to spend the weekend on the couch face down after the ass raping he took in here today [Reply]
Originally Posted by Baby Lee:
And my hypotheticals are not 'slippery-slope' arguments. They are testing your commitment to the values you assert demand the societal changes you seek.
No, you are asserting what my values are then assuming a rigid commitment to them and then making counter-arguments through the use of caricatures. Because despite what your posting style would suggest, you are not a serious person. [Reply]
Originally Posted by NJChiefsFan27:
No, you are asserting what my values are then assuming a rigid commitment to them and then making counter-arguments through the use of caricatures. Because despite what your posting style would suggest, you are not a serious person.
Originally Posted by staylor26:
JFC you’re irony personified.
I humor the dumb arguments you guys make regularly so I don't know what more you want from me. I also think we're having a good discussion (albeit very heated) in the Chappelle thread. [Reply]
Originally Posted by NJChiefsFan27:
No, you are asserting what my values are then assuming a rigid commitment to them and then making counter-arguments through the use of caricatures. Because despite what your posting style would suggest, you are not a serious person.
I thought I was pretty fair in providing a rationale. If you have a better one, feel free to outline it. But I sense that you know the rationale I've summarized is fair and likely superior to what you would provide, you just don't like the implications I pointed out comes along with it. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower:
There's really no argument on whether or not you have XX or XY chromosomes.
Pretty rigid, IMO.
We could take down the men and women signs on the doors and use that instead but most of the idiots these days would have no clue what it meant. [Reply]