Father in viral video of school board arrest says his daughter was raped in school bathroom.
On June 22, Scott Smith was arrested at a Loudoun County, Virginia, school board meeting, a meeting that was ultimately deemed an “unlawful assembly” after many attendees vocally opposed a policy on transgender students.
What people did not know is that weeks prior on May 28, Smith says, a boy allegedly wearing a skirt entered a girls’ bathroom at nearby Stone Bridge High School, where he sexually assaulted Smith’s ninth-grade daughter.
Juvenile records are sealed, but Smith’s attorney Elizabeth Lancaster told The Daily Wire that a boy was charged with two counts of forcible sodomy, one count of anal sodomy, and one count of forcible fellatio, related to an incident that day at that school.
As Loudoun schools sought to pass a controversial transgender policy in June, it concealed that a 9th-grade girl was allegedly raped by a "gender fluid" student in a school bathroom just 3 weeks prior, The Daily Wire has learned.https://t.co/t5IEv1vZZF
Originally Posted by Katipan:
Rape is bad.
We literally start every meeting with that phrase.
You asked a really idiotic question "what should they say?" and you are still continuing to make stupid statements with this stupid response. I was trying to give you the benefit of the doubt that you were just playing dumb but holy crap you really are dumb as hell. :-)
The liberal lunatics are all downplaying this horrible shit and even doubling down on trying to guilt trip us normal/sane people that trannys are so oppressed because we don't think they should invade innocent girls spaces. just unreal
And of course like clockwork the libs in this thread got their asses handed to them yet again. Rinse & repeat. [Reply]
Originally Posted by sully1983:
You asked a really idiotic question "what should they say?" and you are still continuing to make stupid statements with this stupid response. I was trying to give you the benefit of the doubt that you were just playing dumb but holy crap you really are dumb as hell. :-)
The liberal lunatics are all downplaying this horrible shit and even doubling down on trying to guilt trip us normal/sane people that trannys are so oppressed because we don't think they should invade innocent girls spaces. just unreal
And of course like clockwork the libs in this thread got their asses handed to them yet again. Rinse & repeat.
I just think it's really odd for you to care what they think enough to stamp your foot and demand notification.
The only sane person in here is JPB who just wants us to admit that we're making you accept little things so that you'll be broken and accept all the things.
The three biggest national TV networks ignored the national outcry yesterday over a Virginia father’s charge that a dress-wearing, gender-fluid boy sexually assaulted his ninth grade daughter.
As parents gathered before the Loudoun County School Board in the Washington, D.C., suburbs to demand the resignation of the superintendent of schools, news cameras from ABC, CBS, and NBC were nowhere to be found.
Not surprised. The MSM is a bunch of cowards.
Also the Left has been pushing all this "gender fluid" bullshit for quite some time now. These Loudoun schools are guilty of pushing that crap (and it should be noted that the boy wearing the skirt identified as "gender fluid" and he assaulted another girl at a different school shortly after) [Reply]
Originally Posted by Katipan:
I just think it's really odd for you to care what they think enough to stamp your foot and demand notification.
The only sane person in here is JPB who just wants us to admit that we're making you accept little things so that you'll be broken and accept all the things.
Which is fair.
Foul maybe but fair.
No clue who JPB is or what it stands for. And I just think its really odd that so many liberals (whether on this forum or in the media/Hollywood/left wing politicians) are either downplaying this horrific shit or just avoiding it all together. The MSM consisting of ABC, CBS, NBC didn't cover it at all. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Katipan:
Or the 500 other rapes that happen every day. Stop watching the news. Hang out here more. Come get a free joint.
You’re choosing to ignore why this story is obviously unique and relevant.
Between the school covering it up, it’s relevance to trans bathroom issues, and the father of the victim being treated like one of those “domestic terrorists” at school board meetings, this story clearly deserves discussion.
Feel free to continue living in your fantasy land where this is all about a skirt though.. [Reply]
Originally Posted by NinerDoug:
I disagree with the proposition that an individual who is willing to rape another person will respect the "girls" sign on the restroom door, and won't just walk right in, wearing pants instead of a skirt, and commit the same rape.
Yes, I disagree with that.
I don't necessarily disagree with the proposition that it was the rapist's trans status that motivated the school district to sweep it under the rug. It very well could have been - remains to be seen.
But the appropriate way to deal with this is by firing the incompetent piece of shit that did the sweeping, not to pretend that rapists who are not trans don't rape.
Why do you assume this was a premeditated rape? [Reply]
Originally Posted by staylor26:
You’re choosing to ignore why this story is obviously unique and relevant.
Between the school covering it up, it’s relevance to trans bathroom issues, and the father of the victim being treated like one of those “domestic terrorists” at school board meetings, this story clearly deserves discussion.
Feel free to continue living in your fantasy land where this is all about a skirt though..
Thanks. Ive been in a lot of women's restrooms and a lot of skirts and we've had bathroom buddies for my entire life. If it was so easy to pop on a wig and go rapey rapey, you would know. [Reply]
Originally Posted by El Lobo Gordo:
Why do you assume this was a premeditated rape?
Are you suggesting that the rapist just decided to commit the rape after entering the restroom? You could be right.
Is there some reason the rapist could not have observed the victim enter the restroom, and decided to commit the rape at that moment, just before entering the restroom?
Originally Posted by NinerDoug:
Are you suggesting that the rapist just decided to commit the rape after entering the restroom? You could be right.
Is there some reason the rapist could not have observed the victim enter the restroom, and decided to commit the rape at that moment, just before entering the restroom?
What do you consider "premeditated"?
I don't believe most rapist put on their to-do list, "Rape". The rapist may have gone into restroom to adjust the socks in his bra, saw a hottie, alone/cornered and on the spur of the moment decided to take her.
People criticize the notion of safe spaces even though traditionally a woman's restroom has acted as a safe space for women when they did not want to be around men. This equal rights for transgender people is bullshit because a man wearing a skirt and identifies as female is not a female. It is a man engaging in a fiction. [Reply]
Originally Posted by El Lobo Gordo:
I don't believe most rapist put on their to-do list, "Rape". The rapist may have gone into restroom to adjust the socks in his bra, saw a hottie, alone/cornered and on the spur of the moment decided to take her.
Or the rapist may have observed a hottie enter the restroom, and decided on the spur of the moment to commit the rape.
Do you believe the observation of the victim entering the restroom is somehow different from the observation of the victim inside the restroom?
We're talking about an unlocked door here. Takes a mere second or two to open and walk through. [Reply]
Originally Posted by NinerDoug:
Or the rapist may have observed a hottie enter the restroom, and decided on the spur of the moment to commit the rape.
Do you believe the observation of the victim entering the restroom is somehow different from the observation of the victim inside the restroom?
We're talking about an unlocked door here. Takes a mere second or two to open and walk through.
It could have gone down that way too. But here is thing. This male is engaging in a useful fiction. On top of that, its mandated everyone participate in his fiction. That could and probably to a certain degree gave him a sense of entitlement...that everyone is required to engage in HIS fictions.....including his fiction that his victim wanted it. [Reply]
Originally Posted by El Lobo Gordo:
It could have gone down that way too. But here is thing. This male is engaging in a useful fiction. On top of that, its mandated everyone participate in his fiction. That could and probably to a certain degree gave him a sense of entitlement...that everyone is required to engage in HIS fictions.....including his fiction that his victim wanted it.
Of course not! Letting him get away with it the first time then covering it up and allowing him to continue to use the girls bathroom couldn’t have possibly done this! [Reply]
