Chiefs Melvin Ingram signs with Dolphins - Page 4

Breaking: FA DE Melvin Ingram is signing with the #Dolphins, per source.

The 3x Pro Bowler has 51 career sacks with 74 TFLs and 119 QB hits. Another good move for Chris Grier and the Phins.
— Jordan Schultz (@Schultz_Report) May 15, 2022

[Reply]

we need one more scary guy
[Reply]

ya grab Clowney or something ffs but at least we might get a comp pick now right?
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Jewish Rabbi:
Dude ****in sucks and is washed since he didn’t sign here

Carcosa is going to want him dead!
[Reply]

That's rough, MIA did this just to sock it to us.
[Reply]

Spags is going to create pressure from every level. Would have been great to get Melvin, but I am sure we have a Plan B ready.
[Reply]

Hit the road you piece of shit!
[Reply]

Veach has to have a back up plan. I understand Veach didn't want to pay close to Ogbah money for Ingram. That's a big loss though.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by UChieffyBugger:
You can sugar-coat it all you like..the facts are the facts. He got two sacks in KC..if you think he was prime Derrick Thomas here then go ahead buddy :-)

To be honest I liked the focus on the secondary in the draft and FA. Our DL was turd last year, Ingram absolutely elevated it. But we've chosen to focus on shoring up the secondary, that's fine by me. It's also possible he finally starts showing his age and falls off a cliff. But the idea that he was mediocre for us last year, especially compared to what else we had out there, is bizarre. Agree to disagree i guess.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by ThyKingdomCome15:
Veach has to have a back up plan. I understand Veach didn't want to pay close to Ogbah money for Ingram. That's a big loss though.

I don’t think there is a backup plan. We’re done with this for the year. The whole tender/tag thing was just for a free pick. My guess is any plan that exists is more focused on 2023 and beyond. Maybe work some extensions, etc.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by ThyKingdomCome15:
That's rough, MIA did this just to sock it to us.

Originally Posted by ThyKingdomCome15:
Veach has to have a back up plan. I understand Veach didn't want to pay close to Ogbah money for Ingram. That's a big loss though.

Oh no how will Veach replace 1.5 sacks!
[Reply]

Originally Posted by wazu:
I think DJLN probably called it right. The Chiefs are betting on Frank Clark.

-17.337% chance the Chiefs aren't bringing in at least one and possibly two more veteran guys.

No one is betting on Frank Clark.

As always, I'll give Veach the benefit of the doubt until the season starts. No need to fuss at this point before we see the final DL product.
[Reply]

80.4 PFF grade with us last year... yikes! Who we gonna look to instead?
[Reply]

Ugh. Our dline is butt.
[Reply]

Without Hill's picks and cap relief. The D would be Mary J Blige thighs on magnify
[Reply]

Originally Posted by JPH83:
Who? Sorry, I think this is just wrong. He was the best left. If we want to improve the pass rush from the DE we'll need a trade.

Dunlap? Clowney? JPP? Likely a few others via cuts throughout the offseason? And we have plenty of draft assets to trade if need be. Ingram doesn’t move the needle anymore than the aforementioned names, most of which will likely be the same cost.

Ingram isn’t that great. He just stood out last year because nobody on our defense played with any effort or intensity outside of him and Bolton.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
[Reply]