With all the reports of negative issues surrounding WRs who may be available to KC at 32 I'm beginning to think Ladd makes a lot of sense. He's not a #1, he's not flashy but he feels the safest (highest floor) of the group and doesn't have any baggage. My only concern is he's missed some time with injuries but most all have. I'd be fine with Ladd at 32.
Originally Posted by VAChief:
I'm not that excited about McConkey in the first, but I thought this was interesting:
Ladd McConkey is one of my favorite players in this class and I do not care that he's under 6-0 and doesn't even weigh 190 lbs. He's an elite separator at all three levels and he plays every bit as fast as his 4.39 40.
He's a first-round talent for me all day long and Lord help the rest of the AFC if the Chiefs take him at No. 32.
Originally Posted by duncan_idaho:
I just can’t see the Chiefs paying that type of price unless it’s for Alt.
I think it’s a no-brainer if he is inexplicably still available.
But that’s an awful lot of ammo to spend on one player when your team is pretty complete. It’s a desperate move and they’re not desperate.
I think being a complete team is more of the time to make bold moves than when you aren't a complete team. We're not 10 pieces away from being an impact team. We are the impact team that needs a piece or two that would set the long-term up nicely. [Reply]
Originally Posted by kccrow:
I think being a complete team is more of the time to make bold moves than when you aren't a complete team. We're not 10 pieces away from being an impact team. We are the impact team that needs a piece or two that would set the long-term up nicely.
Exactly...
I'd do that trade for Nabers or Odunze...no way in hell I'm giving up that much for ANY LT including Alt...an elite weapon though? Absolutely. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Icon:
With all the reports of negative issues surrounding WRs who may be available to KC at 32 I'm beginning to think Ladd makes a lot of sense. He's not a #1, he's not flashy but he feels the safest (highest floor) of the group and doesn't have any baggage. My only concern is he's missed some time with injuries but most all have. I'd be fine with Ladd at 32.
I'm super high on Pearsall I'd rather just take him in the second than Ladd in R1. Really he's probably a round 3 guy. McKonkey just doesn't do it for me. [Reply]
Originally Posted by O.city:
The guys you're gonna be taking at 32 are gonna be 2nd round type WRs for the most part. Just is what it is.
And that’s completely fine, we’re in the best spot possible. We’re not a player or two away from a Super Bowl. We’re not that desperate team that needs to give up the farm to move up for a player.
Troy Franklin or Pearsall would be good at 32 [Reply]
If I'm gonna sit at 32 and take a WR....I'd go more swing for it and take Leggette I think.
the overall upside is just higher with his physical ability. [Reply]
I think if Jalen McMillan is there in rd 3 we get him, even by a small trade up., even if we got one in the first rd. The value is just too damn good [Reply]