Chiefs Would you take a bullet for Mahones if you knew it wasn’t going to be lethal? - Page 4

Was watching a YouTube of Rob Riggle on a podcast. Riggle was asked whether he would take a non-lethal bullet for Mahones. His answer was yes.

Well would you step in front of Mahomes to take a bullet if you knew it wasn’t going to be lethal?
[Reply]

Originally Posted by RealSNR:
People will die for a lot of stupid reasons. Women, money, land, government...

Is the NFL's best QB who just so happens to play for your team really that much of a stretch compared to those other reasons?

And the questions isn't even asking you to die. It's asking you to take a non-lethal bullet.

Well I suppose Pat can have Gehrig Dieter sing I will always love you as you sip you beer through a straw in you motorized chair.
[Reply]

I’d shoot myself in the dick right now if it saved Mahomes from a hang nail
[Reply]

I'd much rather pop the shooter in the face before he fired, but if that wasn't an option, yes I would. Sure would suck to be the guy who could have saved him but didn't.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by srvy:
Well I suppose Pat can have Gehrig Dieter sing I will always love you as you sip you beer through a straw in you motorized chair.

Although that would technically be “non-legal”, thats too horrible of an outcome for a fun thread. It would be “more fun” to take a bullet straight through the arm without hitting any bones or arteries.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by kysirsoze:
In addition to the obvious reasons for yes, Patrick also just seems like a better person than me who is in a position to do a lot more good for the world. The altruistic choice is to jump on that bullet.

You can’t jump on a bullet. You’re thinking of a grenade.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by smithandrew051:
I’d shoot myself in the dick right now if it saved Mahomes from a hang nail

Chiefs Kingdom appreciates the sacrifice. :-)
[Reply]

Originally Posted by TLO:
Pros:

- Save Mahomes from a devastating injury.
- Probably a lot of sweet perks from the Chiefs
- Handed the keys to the city.
- Fame for being the guy who "took that bullet for Mahomes"

Cons:

- Getting shot.
- Excruciating pain
- Possible long term physical and emotional damage
- Getting shot

My conclusion: Seems like there's a lot of willing participants to take the bullet. I choose you, Pikachu! I'll post my adulation for you on chiefsplanet.com and enjoy the benifits of not being shot.

The pros outweigh the cons!
[Reply]

fuckin' A i would

[Reply]

Originally Posted by srvy:
Well I suppose Pat can have Gehrig Dieter sing I will always love you as you sip you beer through a straw in you motorized chair.

Your definition of lethal is different from mine.

No, a bullet that turns me into Gabby Giffords or Terri Schiavo is not worth Mahomes. To me, I interpret lethal as a bullet that significantly alters your perception and ability to think and function on the earth.

Lose a limb? Non lethal. Lose 75% of your brain? That's lethal.
[Reply]

Lethal is dead non lethal you survive. Maybe unscathed maybe not.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup:
Hell no I am not taking a lethal bullet for a football player.

Fuck off!!!!!
[Reply]

I'd wish him the best of luck in his recovery
[Reply]

Originally Posted by smithandrew051:
I’d shoot myself in the dick right now if it saved Mahomes from a hang nail

HELL yes brother!!! This right here is a REAL fan!!!!!
[Reply]

Bullets seem like they would really hurt. And a non-lethal bullet could still completely destroy a person's quality of life. I adore Patrick Mahomes II and would push any of you in front of him in a second, but I'd probably dive for cover myself.
[Reply]