Originally Posted by ThaVirus:
Looks like it made $1 billion already. Crazy.
That's huge, and the resurgence in demand for more Garfield and Maguire Spiderman movies is a major bonus for me, and those like me that just didn't find the Holland version very good.
To see Garfield Spider Man in Morbius, or future Venom movies, those move from films I briefly considered seeing, to shut up and take my money if they make that happen . [Reply]
Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare:
The Top 5 always should include Iron Man that started the MCU
I'll always appreciate RDJ and what that film started -- but it's not one I find as enjoyable as the ones I listed above. Definitely don't blame anyone for putting it in their top 5 for what that movie started, though. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Wallcrawler:
That's huge, and the resurgence in demand for more Garfield and Maguire Spiderman movies is a major bonus for me, and those like me that just didn't find the Holland version very good .
That's the beauty of No Way Home, though. Holland's Spider-Man is now a clean slate. [Reply]
So between the wife and boy we have 5 streaming options and this flick is, naturally, on none of them.
I'm sure I could actually pay for it on Amazon but I need to know this is a legit B+ to A movie before spending my herbal supplement monies on it... [Reply]
Originally Posted by Rausch:
So between the wife and boy we have 5 streaming options and this flick is, naturally, on none of them.
I'm sure I could actually pay for it on Amazon but I need to know this is a legit B+ to A movie before spending my herbal supplement monies on it...
New release Marvel movies currently have a 45 day window before they go to Disney+ like Shang-Chi. But this movie is a co production with Sony so it will be longer before it’s available to stream. [Reply]
With it being a Sony co production it will be going to Starz for 18 months before being available on Disney+. If it had been released in January it would have went to Netflix. [Reply]
I'm being careful to skip spoilers so I haven't read any posts before this one, but quick question to those that have.
My wife is a marvel fan but a casual one. I often have to remind her of plot points of previous films. She liked the original spiderman films but hasn't seen them in a decade and had never seen the Andrew Garfield movies. Do you think she would enjoy it still? [Reply]
Originally Posted by Chitownchiefsfan:
I'm being careful to skip spoilers so I haven't read any posts before this one, but quick question to those that have.
My wife is a marvel fan but a casual one. I often have to remind her of plot points of previous films. She liked the original spiderman films but hasn't seen them in a decade and had never seen the Andrew Garfield movies. Do you think she would enjoy it still?
Yes. My students had no context for any of the spidermans before Tom and still loved it. Just having context for the Maguire era villains is more than enough. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Chitownchiefsfan:
I'm being careful to skip spoilers so I haven't read any posts before this one, but quick question to those that have.
My wife is a marvel fan but a casual one. I often have to remind her of plot points of previous films. She liked the original spiderman films but hasn't seen them in a decade and had never seen the Andrew Garfield movies. Do you think she would enjoy it still?
Originally Posted by Chitownchiefsfan:
I'm being careful to skip spoilers so I haven't read any posts before this one, but quick question to those that have.
My wife is a marvel fan but a casual one. I often have to remind her of plot points of previous films. She liked the original spiderman films but hasn't seen them in a decade and had never seen the Andrew Garfield movies. Do you think she would enjoy it still?
Yes.
Having some context with the prior films helps, but it's not necessary. [Reply]