These two (with the assistance of others I’m sure) were able to sift through the shit that media fed people regarding Hill and his “slam-dunk” guilt and find some truth. You don’t have to agree with their methods, you can whine about their “editing”, but a huge tip of the hat for their perseverance, loyalty and fervour in exposing the fraud that was sold to the public.
Originally Posted by TEX:
Sure the hell did. He and I went at it many times. And you're right - any one that can conclude those types of things with such minimal information is telling and is a HUGE deal.
Originally Posted by TEX:
Naw, when you try to bury someone first thing without all the facts, that says quite a bit about a person.
It’s truly amazing what a semi-voluntarily celibate man filled with white hot rage against women can accomplish in defense of alleged domestic abusers. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Cave Johnson:
It’s truly amazing what a semi-voluntarily celibate man filled with white hot rage against women can accomplish in defense of alleged domestic abusers.
Originally Posted by Cave Johnson:
It’s truly amazing what a semi-voluntarily celibate man filled with white hot rage against women can accomplish in defense of alleged domestic abusers.
Originally Posted by BigRedChief:
I’ve been a backer of Clay on here when 99% of posters were wanting him banned. Ridiculing him as an incel living in moms basement. I’ve always gave him props.
Keitzman is off air and Hill is not suspended...it's been a great offseason thus far.
In our world of media narrative and social justice 99.9% of the time, they get to destroy the accused and this one small episode didnt go their way and the level of butthurt is quite enjoyable. [Reply]
