Originally Posted by Red Dawg:
Hardman has 10 post season sacks for us? Not the same.
Hardman also produced more in the regular season while contributing in the post season at a fraction of the cost when compared to his peers. Our ROI on him was higher than Clark. [Reply]
Originally Posted by TwistedChief:
I'm confused. What exactly did he say? Has he badmouthed the Chiefs?
The Chiefs no longer wanted him. He probably didn't have many contract offers and went to the highest bidder. It's not like he jumped ship to a competitor because he thought they had a better chance of winning. He did what 99.9% of the population would've done in the same situation.
This so odd. Take a deep breath, dude.
I've never understood hating a guy for wanting to continue there career. The Chiefs didn't give Clark an offer. They outright released Jamaal Charles and Derrick Johnson, but people are gonna be mad at them for going to a division rival? So fucking stupid. [Reply]
I love Frank Clark. He got the Broncos to pay him $5.5 million and he probably won't get 1 sack bc he knows he went to a shit team and just wants his payday. Just like Sean Payton.
Milking our rivals rich owner? Gotta respect it. [Reply]
Originally Posted by mabbott:
The fact that he has been injured most of the year and is an "illness" scratch for this week makes it a hard pass for me.
I appreciate what Frank did for us; however, unless Denver is paying a majority of his salary for the rest of the season, no thanks.
They're gonna cut his ass.
In which case he'll be available for the pro-rated veterans minimum.
And I STILL have no interest in him. All he'd do is take snaps away from FAU. [Reply]
He's gonna come back just in time for the playoffs and record exactly 3 sacks in the postseason just so he can break the all time post season sack record and we'll all be simultaneously thrilled and baffled at how the fuck he pulled that bit of history off. [Reply]