Originally Posted by poolboy:
So you want Pat throwing 50 times a game?
We gotta keep him healthy...thats what the running game is for...especially when it is working
2nd and five is a great place to be
Until the game is in doubt until we get the #1 seed. Yes.
Honestly, if there was a Game Theory Optimal strategy it would probably advise to sit Mahomes in games where we are massive favorites, because more than likely we will win anyway. [Reply]
Originally Posted by poolboy:
So you want Pat throwing 50 times a game?
We gotta keep him healthy...thats what the running game is for...especially when it is working
2nd and five is a great place to be
Agreed. Pat could get hurt if you expose him long enough. Assuming the defense you play isn’t a dumpster fire, you also get the obviously higher chance of picks. Tailor the in game plan based on how the Defense is playing you. [Reply]
Originally Posted by BWillie:
You can certainly still be successful but it is lowering the points on average you could score per game. Never, ever, ever run on 1st and 10 when you have a Top 10 QB. Or 2nd and 10, either. Never Ever.
Bosa and Mack are probably the best pass rushing duo in the league. Running the ball and setting up RPO’s hurts their pass rush significantly.
It’s not wise to go pass heavy full time against a pass rush like this [Reply]
Originally Posted by BWillie:
Until the game is in doubt until we get the #1 seed. Yes.
Honestly, if there was a Game Theory Optimal strategy it would probably advise to sit Mahomes in games where we are massive favorites, because more than likely we will win anyway.
You're wrong, though. He's not genuine at all. Blatantly shit posts in every thread I see him in with nothing but contrarian hot takes. It's actually quite impressive how it still manages to get a response from folks. [Reply]
Originally Posted by BWillie:
Until the game is in doubt until we get the #1 seed. Yes.
Honestly, if there was a Game Theory Optimal strategy it would probably advise to sit Mahomes in games where we are massive favorites, because more than likely we will win anyway.
Originally Posted by Superturtle:
You're wrong, though. He's not genuine at all. Blatantly shit posts in every thread I see him in with nothing but contrarian hot takes. It's actually quite impressive how it still manages to get a response from folks.
I don’t know about other stuff but with this, he absolutely is genuine. He truly believes teams like the Chargers and Chiefs should NEVER run the ball. Literally never. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Superturtle:
You're wrong, though. He's not genuine at all. Blatantly shit posts in every thread I see him in with nothing but contrarian hot takes. It's actually quite impressive how it still manages to get a response from folks.
Back in 1980 if you told fans you should go for it on 4th down insteqd of punt they would look at you like you are crazy.
In 1990, if you told NBA GMa ans coaches you need to shoot 4x as many threes per game they would laugh.
In 1980, if you told MLB managers to not care as much about batting average, they would not believe you. [Reply]
Originally Posted by htismaqe:
I don’t know about other stuff but with this, he absolutely is genuine. He truly believes teams like the Chargers and Chiefs should NEVER run the ball. Literally never.
Incorrect. The only situations they should ever consider running the ball is on short and goal, 2nd or 3rd and short and when trying to run the clock out. But other than that, stop doing it. [Reply]
Originally Posted by BWillie:
Until the game is in doubt until we get the #1 seed. Yes.
Honestly, if there was a Game Theory Optimal strategy it would probably advise to sit Mahomes in games where we are massive favorites, because more than likely we will win anyway.
Originally Posted by BWillie:
Until the game is in doubt until we get the #1 seed. Yes.
Honestly, if there was a Game Theory Optimal strategy it would probably advise to sit Mahomes in games where we are massive favorites, because more than likely we will win anyway.
