Originally Posted by O.city:
The amount the gave up for Clark plus the contract was only gonna be worth it if he was an all pro defensive player of the year type dude
So far, that hasn’t happened and he’s now hurt
So like Justin Houston, who the hindsight brigade are felating? [Reply]
Originally Posted by staylor26:
If you’re making your argument about the eye test than you are even dumber than I thought. How anybody can say they’ve watched these two and it’s a marginal difference is beyond me.
Again, Ford is so fucking bad that the 49ers have put him in a situational pass rusher role despite paying him big money and trading away a 2nd. What the fuck do you not get about this?
Ok kid. You're fucking delusional if you think Clark is "good" against the run. Laughing my fucking ass off. What I seem to get is that neither are good against the run but I'm saying I see Clark as slightly better. You, however, seem to think Clark is actually good against the run. [Reply]
Originally Posted by staylor26:
Because they got him for a fucking 3rd round pick because the Texans went full retard with no GM :-)
Are you suggesting they had the foresight to know this would happen? They would’ve gladly let Clark play on the tag just like Clowney is. This is a terrible rebuttal.
Your claim was they couldn’t afford him.
Don’t move the goalposts and deflect.
Just own the fact Seattle didn’t WANT to pay him. [Reply]
Originally Posted by kccrow:
I don't hate Clark. I hate that he's playing like ass on a large contract.
I thought the decision was bad one when it all went down. It's not about praising Dee Ford, it's about stating that Clark wasn't worth it at the time because he wasn't that type of massive improvement you'd expect for such compensation. There wasn't enough of a difference, in my opinion, nor statistically, to warrant Veach making that decision.
I don't care about dick size, the woman I **** is happier than hell with mine. It is about looking at things rationally and I don't think many are with regards to the entire thought process that went into this entire debacle. Apparently others think Clark was light years better than I ever saw him against the run. I never agreed with Veach's decision and it's looking more and more like I never will. I'm really starting to dislike Veach as a whole. You look at Hitchens and Clark and have to wonder. You look at his drafts so far and they are a bit of a head-scratcher, but the 2019 draft does have more promise than the 2018 one. Luckily he stumbled into Thornhill, the guy had no business being there that late.
At least Ogbah is playing well for his money.
That was a fair and candid response.
There are discussions that can happen without unreasonable discourse...
I'm glad we're moving in the right direction... [Reply]
Originally Posted by RunKC:
Okay then take away Honey Badger and Okafor. Can’t afford them if you keep Houston.
Spare us the Clowney bullshit. He’s been worse than Clark this year and he’s a broke dick.
You could have restructured Houston instead of asking him to take a paycut and a restructure. Or you could have moved money around with other players or with Matheiu and Okafor.
You could have kept Houston and still gotten the players we have now and still kept your picks. Would the restructure have cost us a little more in the long run? Yeah but at least it wouldn't be anywhere near as much as what Clark will cost the rest of his contract.
...and Houston got another sack and forced fumble today.
Oh yeah...weren't you the guy always talking about the run defense sucks because of Jones and how much better it got when he got injured? Does that same logic apply to Clark? Cause we just held the best running back in the league to 71 yards on 3.4 yards per carry with Jones and without Clark. [Reply]
