Originally Posted by The Franchise:
I think adding a second TE and a replacement for Watkins doesn’t mean that you change the offense. It allows you to do more of what you do now. Add guys who can tear up the intermediate parts of the field and still help underneath in shallow routes.
Yes, and it would also help to have somebody so the offense didn't take such a big hit when Kelce is out. [Reply]
Originally Posted by The Franchise:
You’ve watched film? What film would that be?
Really?
There’s a wonderful invention called YouTube that has numerous full games of Kentucky football and some people are even kind enough to do all 22 breakdowns. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Pasta Little Brother:
Now get Okung/Ingram, nail the draft and head back to a 3rd straight SB. ****, we probably have enough already.
I'm just not an Okung fan. I'd rather draft someone in the first or second and play him at LT> [Reply]
Originally Posted by RunKC:
Corner is full of riches in this draft. Dane Brugler just tweeted that he has 11 graded as top 62 picks.
I think they may take one based on principle, especially that Memphis kid that House coached. Then take one in the 4th that has traits and wait out Ingram.
Gonna be really damn interesting to see
They seem to be really interested in CB's, especially guys that could go around 31.
I think a big part of it is the cost control you get with a first round draft pick. CB's can be really expensive. [Reply]
Originally Posted by O.city:
How does signing a vet matter in that regard?
I'm with you. Nothing but a bunch of below average stopgaps left now at the position. Signing any of them wouldn't really move the needle since we're still drafting a LT high, most likely in the first. [Reply]
Originally Posted by O.city:
The best probability in the draft to get the right LT is to trade up for one of the elite prospects. Thats too costly. Or so I hear :-)
They're not trading up into the top 7-8 for a tackle. That's what it would take to get Sewell.
The gap between Slater/Darrisaw and Cosmi/Eichenberg isn't worth it.
Originally Posted by Superturtle:
I'm with you. Nothing but a bunch of below average stopgaps left now at the position. Signing any of them wouldn't really move the needle since we're still drafting a LT high, most likely in the first.
Even if they trade up in the 1st, there's no guarantee the guy can or will start day 1.
Signing a stop gap gives them options with little to no additional cost. There's no reason NOT to do it, especially if you're dead set on drafting a LT high. [Reply]
