The NFL did not find that #Chiefs WR Tyreek Hill violated the Personal Conduct Policy. He may attend Kansas City's training camp and participate in all club activities.
Originally Posted by Mecca:
If this means Tyreek will flip a toothpick in Brady's face followed by a Frank Clark powerbomb through a table to Belichick...I'm in.
While were on the subject let's replace the chop with the DX "Suck It!" chant. [Reply]
Originally Posted by FAX:
I don't know the percentage, but this wasn't and isn't 100% about football for me, personally ... maybe 30/70. It was mainly an issue of fairness and the rule of law (assuming there is still such a thing as "rule of law").
No way should a bunch of media "personalities" try to railroad a person on the basis of advancing their own career. Yet that's exactly how this went down. Problem is, it's still going on because the assholes won't admit they screwed up, failed their readership/audience, and violated the principles of their position of responsibility.
The good news is that they revealed their true natures and, hopefully, people will remember that going forward.
FAX
You nailed it Fax !! But as you know these are the "times" we live in "gossip/libel with no accountability" because pride/egos of our culture are soooooo out of control and especially in the celebrity arena of sports, politics and entertainment.
I suspect Florio and the likes of him will come out and play the "NFL did not exonerate him they just did not find any evidence to this point and can reopen the case at any time if and when new info arises" card.:-) [Reply]
If evidence was found that would clear Tyreek of the 2014 incident (perhaps Crystal breaks down and admits to making the whole thing up), and prove that he pleaded "guilty" only due to his lack of money/time... could that case go back to court to clear his name, or is that case closed forever? [Reply]
Originally Posted by Molitoth:
If evidence was found that would clear Tyreek of the 2014 incident (perhaps Crystal breaks down and admits to making the whole thing up), and prove that he pleaded "guilty" only due to his lack of money/time... could that case go back to court to clear his name, or is that case closed forever?
Legally it doesn't exist; it was expunged from his record after he adhered to the terms of his plea agreement.
This has nothing to do with a 'clear name' - by the letter of the law it already has been cleared.
This is strictly optics and he'll never truly be clear of that stigma, rightly or wrongly. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Mecca:
Everyone is so mad right now, it's making me laugh so hard.
I LOVE IT MWUAHAHAHAHA.
I'm prepared to be the bad guy all season. Can't wait till 'Reek is carving up NFL defenses making all these salty knuckle draggers whine and cry. [Reply]
