I just don't see any. Bears need a lot of help on D and O line. Weapons are okay but Fields can't keep running it the way he does and expect to have a long career.
Who do you think trades up and grabs the pick? [Reply]
It's about the next 10 years. And you probably need a better QB for the job.
Fields has gotten the short end of the stick in Chicago, but teams know that. You can probably trade him for a couple nice picks and build around the QB you know gives you the best chance.
I'd trade him, and use to pick to take a QB. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Direckshun:
It's not about 2023.
It's not about 2024.
It's about the next 10 years. And you probably need a better QB for the job.
Fields has gotten the short end of the stick in Chicago, but teams know that. You can probably trade him for a couple nice picks and build around the QB you know gives you the best chance.
I'd trade him, and use to pick to take a QB.
I don't think Stroud is an obviously safer/better bet than Fields.
Different, more conventional, yes. But any more likely to be a championship caliber passer? Eh...probably not. And you'd take a solid beating on a Fields deal; I think you'd be lucky to get a 2 this year and a 3 next for him given that 2 years of his rookie contract are already used up.
You'd get more than that by simply moving from the 1 spot to the 2 (presuming you can convince the Texans that you have a deal to move someone PAST them for Stroud).
I don't see an obvious 1.1 quarterback in this draft. [Reply]
I think Indy/Seattle (#4 & #5) is an interesting dynamic in regards to two teams who are likely in the market for a quarterback, that could potentially trade up. Would still give Chicago the ability to draft an elite player. It would go against what Seattle has done historically in regards to how they approach the draft, but since they drafted so well last season and have the extra picks, maybe they’d splurge this year and take their #1 QB on their draft board.. With Chicago wasting a high 2nd on the Claypool trade, I think they’ll be motivated to trade down.
As DJ said though, which QB you are drafting is a big question. Gotta really fall in love with one of these QB’s to justify the cost. [Reply]
If they think Fields is their guy then they still have every reason in the world to stay at #1 and grab Will Anderson. It's literally a no-brainer. [Reply]
Originally Posted by kccrow:
If they think Fields is their guy then they still have every reason in the world to stay at #1 and grab Will Anderson. It's literally a no-brainer.
Yeah, definitely.
I'm interested to see which QB goes first. There are some rumblings starting from evaluators that Stroud is elevating... [Reply]
Originally Posted by kccrow:
If they think Fields is their guy then they still have every reason in the world to stay at #1 and grab Will Anderson. It's literally a no-brainer.
They'd still be wise to leverage that pick.
Try to coax a 2 out of the Texans to move down a spot. Work the phones to convince them that Seattle is looking to get ahead of them to grab Stroud.
But yes, Will Anderson should be their guy. [Reply]
Originally Posted by kccrow:
If they think Fields is their guy then they still have every reason in the world to stay at #1 and grab Will Anderson. It's literally a no-brainer.
I think Jalen Carter vs Will Anderson is a tough decision. Jalen Carter is one helluva athlete. [Reply]