QB 6 4.11%

OT 48 32.88%

G/C 1 0.68%

RB 0 0%

TE 0 0%

WR 64 43.84%

DT 6 4.11%

DE 21 14.38%

LB 0 0%

CB 0 0%

S 0 0%

Other 0 0%

OT. We have nothing proven on one side or the other. Keeping The Franchise upright is the of paramount importance.
[Reply]

OT

It will be difficult not to address it with our first pick.
[Reply]

BPA
[Reply]

Tackle
[Reply]

WR
[Reply]

EDGE
[Reply]

Losing Burton was a pretty big blow, so I’d go FB.
[Reply]

WR, duh.
[Reply]

It's not QB
[Reply]

For pure need, it would be a Frachise LT, but with the talent available it's passrushers
[Reply]

We lost both our starting tackles and only replaced one. So we still need an OT the worst.
I appreciate JuJu but he should not be that hard to replace.
[Reply]

DE. Particularly a speed rusher. They don't have one on the roster and out biggest competition in the AFC has a new LT that couldn't block speed to save his life. After that DT.

I'd say WR but I don't trust Veach to draft one and I don't trust the coaching staff to coach him.
[Reply]

WR OT DE
[Reply]

I have zero faith in Niang, so probably OT. But if there isn't one worth taking or one that they don't think is ready to play. Then take a WR, edge or DT that is worthy of the pick.
[Reply]