Hasnt Cuban expressed interest in the past?
[Reply]

I know you're kidding but I kinda like the ring of it. It's definitely better than Manders.
[Reply]

I'll repeat... The fact that it is this damn hard to get rid of an owner who is cartoonishly bad in every possible way, including illegal shit, is such a drain on sports.

Owners need to have skin in the game. If this is the bar for how low you need to go before anyone considers selling that's a massive problem. Fans and cities that shower teams with public funding should have at least a tiny bit of accountability
[Reply]

Once you reach a certain threshold, no amount of incompetence can keep you from making money.
[Reply]

DMV is celebrating right now.
[Reply]

Washington Wombwreckers
[Reply]

It would be much better if the teams were owned by trusts of the municipalities where they are based. Cities should not be held hostage by a bunch of greedy cocksuckers once their stadium needs its first paint job.
[Reply]

Washington Progressives
[Reply]

Their mascot would be that aging hooker from the insurance commercials.
[Reply]

This is right in Bezos wheelhouse.

Tilman Fertitta may have an interest too.

There's also BIG money around D.C. and we could see a group of locals pool resources.
[Reply]

Yeah, that would be nice. I'm not sure I'm a fan of government investing in sports teams as opposed to jobs and housing and that sort of thing, but I guess it could be the college model. The city invests in a sports team because it produces excess revenue that can be used for actual real government purposes.
[Reply]

Washington Swamps
[Reply]

Not bad. Shit allover your pants, yourself and everyone around you and your punishment is to make billions in pure profit to go the fuck away forever.
[Reply]

W. O. K. E. woke! woke! woke!
[Reply]

NFL finance committee meets in March. That's when the team gets sold. Auction will take place and there's going to be 20 or 30 bidders.
[Reply]