This is a long ass article and definitely worth your time.
7.14.19 update:
Without further delay - we present some additional research. This article isn't about suspensions. This is now 100% about daylighting wrongs and helping someone caught in a tangled web of manipulation and pain. https://t.co/bQNC8Cyju4
— Chiefs Kingdom Editorial Board (@1_ChiefsKingdom) July 14, 2019
This morning at 6am PST, we received images labeled States Evidence & Court Transcripts from Tyreek's March 9, 2015 Probable Cause hearing. You can read about how Tyreek asked Crystal to leave his place on 12/11/14 before stuff went down & more .... https://t.co/jz0Hqj052i
— Chiefs Kingdom Editorial Board (@1_ChiefsKingdom) July 16, 2019
Originally Posted by Chief Roundup:
No he is not. Not at all opening that can or worms. If you are being extorted you handle it like Tyrann and turn that over to the cops.
Mathieu wasn't intimately linked to his extortionist...to the tune of sharing a 3 year old and twins on the way.
Dumb comparison...Hill had a vested interest, at least initially, in keeping her out of legal trouble. [Reply]
So, is there a chance they don't end up suspending him for any games? Maybe something like Foster got and get a few game checks taken or something? [Reply]
Lisa Friel, Jennifer Gaffney interview Tyreek Hill in Kansas City today; a future meeting with Roger Goodell in New York remains possible https://t.co/aTFIbaiRwU
Originally Posted by O.city:
So, is there a chance they don't end up suspending him for any games? Maybe something like Foster got and get a few game checks taken or something?
If he is issued even a single game...it's based 100% on KCTV5 prematurely airing an edited audio recording. We know, now, that the recording was created to extort Hill. The damage of showing only a small portion of the conversation is what created the "optics"..which every media outlet ran with. These "optics" are the only grounds for issuing a suspension..
Hill should sue them for damages. They aired an extortion attempt and modified it to frame him in the worst possible light.
He was free and clear until they decided to go the "clickbait" route...and unethically run an unvetted recording. That's their responsibility...
Here is ground rules #2/#4 for defamation...
2. "Published" means that a third party heard or saw the statement -- that is, someone other than the person who made the statement or the person the statement was about. "Published" doesn't necessarily mean that the statement was printed in a book -- it just needs to have been made public through social media, television, radio, speeches, gossip, or even loud conversation
4. The statement must be "injurious." Since the whole point of defamation law is to take care of injuries to reputation, those suing for defamation must show how their reputations were hurt by the false statement -- for example, the person lost work; was shunned by neighbors, friends, or family members; or was harassed by the press.
This headline appeared in the KC Star the day after the recording aired...someone please tell how this inst harassment from the press or damaging to one's reputation.
If the Chiefs care about honor and decency, Tyreek Hill can’t be part of this team
BY VAHE GREGORIAN
April 25, 2019 10:31 PM,
Updated 20 minutes ago [Reply]
Hopefully Lisa Friel learned her lesson from the Ezekiel Elliott investigation and doesn't withhold information that could potentially exonerate Tyreek.
The NFLPA sued her for doing that in the Elliott investigation. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Lurker:
Mostly to Clay. A little bit to ShaggyShane. To whoever said "DM for the secret location" in the video the two of them did. To whoever started posting about the location to begin with (pretty sure that was Clay but don't know).
To me this stuff is equivalent to "doxxing" somebody. Or bringing Reid's family into things. Admittedly it's less emotional than that, but it's just off-limits as far as I'm concerned. A girl is terrified of a stalker who won't leave her alone. Why can't she see he's just appreciating her?
Hill and Dieter can take care of themselves. If Clay is right, maybe Hill appreciates the support. Maybe some fanboy behavior somehow compensates for the mob of torches Hill's been subjected to. I don't know.
Maybe Hill and Dieter WANTED people to find them? I doubt it... if they want to interact with fans, there are far easier ways to go about it. But maybe they only wanted to interact with TRUE fans, fans who were willing to figure out where they practice. Again, I doubt it.
I know I'm not going to change your behavior, Clay. But I'm sure I'm not the only one who thinks it's pretty rich that you of all people are asking me of all people to "Please Stop".
Originally Posted by BlackOp:
If he is issued even a single game...it's based 100% on KCTV5 prematurely airing an edited audio recording. We know, now, that the recording was created to extort Hill. The damage of showing only a small portion of the conversation is what created the "optics"..which every media outlet ran with. These "optics" are the only grounds for issuing a suspension..
Hill should sue them for damages. They aired an extortion attempt and modified it to frame him in the worst possible light.
He was free and clear until they decided to go the "clickbait" route...and unethically run an unvetted recording.
It wasn't edited. They didn't play all of it, IIRC, but he said what he said. [Reply]
I’ve been skimming this story every so often so sorry that I’m not caught up but was wondering if someone could explain to me why Hill isn’t meeting with Goodell himself. This has been one of the biggest stories of the offseason, if not the biggest. Why would he delegate this important meeting? [Reply]
Originally Posted by YontsRBake:
I’ve been skimming this story every so often so sorry that I’m not caught up but was wondering if someone could explain to me why Hill isn’t meeting with Goodell himself. This has been one of the biggest stories of the offseason, if not the biggest. Why would he delegate this important meeting?
I believe there is a process. A meeting with Goodell occurs after all facts are gathered and if it's deemed necessary. I'm with you in that IMO it's necessary. [Reply]
Originally Posted by O.city:
It wasn't edited. They didn't play all of it, IIRC, but he said what he said.
It can be construed as "edited"...if I play you 2 minutes of an 11 minute song...it most definitely is considered an 'edited" version. They cherry-picked the section that would cause the most damage...
Remember, this is now an extortion attempt. It wasn't known when it was aired...and that is the responsibility of the TV station.
If Hill is suspended...they are responsible for the damages due to their negligence. [Reply]
