Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe:
The tide is turning. Denver had the game in their hands. Next offseason we're bringing in Rodgers and a new streak is startin
Javonte had 4 YPC until garbage time. Even with all those broken tackles, KC contained him with ease. Denver scored 1 TD against a broken coverage in a prevent defense....scary! Denver was powerless against Spags blitzes. KC owns 3rd down on defense. [Reply]
Javonte had a good game and it meant nothing. He was not a difference maker, he did not destroy us. He got some yards and truly did nothing until late in the game when it was already decided. But, I was impressed with him finding the gaps and hitting them. [Reply]
I hope we have to play our starters week 18 to get the 1 seed so we keep the streak alive. Hate to see it end on a flukey game we didn’t play our starters. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe:
Maybe they'll make a run at Russell Wilson.
If Denver makes a run at Rodgers they may not have to give up anything but 2022 picks, as they have 5 picks in the first two days of the draft next year.
Denver should get a few extra 3rd round picks in 2023 by letting Bridgewater and Melvin Gordon walk in free agency.
Why the hell would Rodgers want to leave a top 5 roster, top 5 coach and the easiest division in football to play against Mahomes and Herbert?
Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe:
He wanted to go to Denver this year. Denver has Jeudy, Sutton, Patrick, and Hamler locked up for the next three years, not to mention Fant, Albert O, and Baby Terrell Davis.
Rodgers is smart. He knows that adding him to a team with a defensive mastermind who holds offenses like the Chargers and Chiefs to 16 points or less is a lethal combination.
Who the **** are those guys? They sure as hell didn't do anything against KC. [Reply]
Rodgers watched KC corners absolutely own Denvers pathetic WR groups and laughed his ass off. Hes glad he didn't go to pile high. He'll choose Pitt over Denver anyway if he did leaven [Reply]
Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe:
Had Teddy not thrown two INT's our offense would've been fine. We did what we wanted to for the most part. The plan was to pummel you with the run game, and we did it.
Denver had that game in their hands. 3 or 4 plays decided the outcome.
“If only everything had gone perfectly, we would have had a chance!”
Cool story. Now let’s do the Chiefs. What do you think the score looks like if KC doesn’t drop a million passes, including the other three gift-wrapped INTs that Teddy lobbed to them, and if they didn’t have a bunch of holding penalties?
The Chiefs gave a D effort and played with no energy after the first quarter, yet still led 22-3 until garbage time.
Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe:
Had Teddy not thrown two INT's our offense would've been fine. We did what we wanted to for the most part. The plan was to pummel you with the run game, and we did it.
Denver had that game in their hands. 3 or 4 plays decided the outcome.
I agree. The NFL should really eliminate scoring and instead have judges choose who wins. Pesky scoring. If you eliminate the fact that Denver didnt score a td till late in the 4th quarter and ignore the fact they scored 3 points for the whole game up till that point - then Denver had the game in their hands!
You wait till Denver gets a QB! (12 times and counting). [Reply]
