Originally Posted by RunKC:
It will be a pass rusher, DB or offensive weapon.
I honestly don’t see a DB in the 1st. It’s already the strength of this defense and they’ve shown the ability to find guys on days 2 and 3.
If the safety group were better at the top, I could maybe see a versatile safety there, but there doesn’t even look to be a sure 1st rounder in the entire group.
With that said, I almost added Jevon Holland because I could see him possibly ending up a 1st when it’s all said and done, but that’s about it. [Reply]
Originally Posted by staylor26:
I honestly don’t see a DB in the 1st. It’s already the strength of this defense and they’ve shown the ability to find guys on days 2 and 3.
If the safety group were better at the top, I could maybe see a versatile safety there, but there doesn’t even look to be a sure 1st rounder in the entire group.
With that said, I almost added Jevon Holland because I could see him possibly ending up a 1st when it’s all said and done, but that’s about it.
I think they'll be looking for somebody to replace Sorenson soon. A DB/S in that mold. [Reply]
Originally Posted by htismaqe:
Robinson and Watkins are both FA. We still need a WR regardless of what Hardman does.
Let Pringle do it.
We've always heard about how hard WR is to learn in Andy's system. I don't think spending on a free agent WR will be ideal, unless it's a lesser dude like Willie Snead or something. [Reply]
We've always heard about how hard WR is to learn in Andy's system. I don't think spending on a free agent WR will be ideal, unless it's a lesser dude like Willie Snead or something.
That still gives us three WRs. Unless you’re going to have Dieter and Fortson/Kemp round out the top 5.....we still need another WR. [Reply]
Originally Posted by The Franchise:
That still gives us three WRs. Unless you’re going to have Dieter and Fortson/Kemp round out the top 5.....we still need another WR.
I'd probably keep Robinson but you could get another one in the draft. doesn't have to be in the first. [Reply]
We've always heard about how hard WR is to learn in Andy's system. I don't think spending on a free agent WR will be ideal, unless it's a lesser dude like Willie Snead or something.
No. Pringle is where he is for a reason. If he was a guy that could contribute, he would be.
He's behind not only Hardman but also Robinson.
If both Robinson and Watkins are gone, they need new blood. Pringle is a backup. [Reply]
Originally Posted by htismaqe:
No. Pringle is where he is for a reason. If he was a guy that could contribute, he would be.
He's behind not only Hardman but also Robinson.
If both Robinson and Watkins are gone, they need new blood. Pringle is a backup.
As long as Hill and Kelce are here, they're all gonna be fighting for table scraps as those two will and should suck up targets. Hardman needs more, but he should get them next year I'd think as it's sink or swim time. [Reply]