Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins:
Wow. The Jets paid almost nothing for that.
Yup. I think that's why the Chiefs didn't trade down. The Jets gave up NOTHING to move into the top 5. Unreal. The draft board really was out the window this year. [Reply]
Originally Posted by J Diddy:
A shit ton of teams wanted Cassell. We got him and a productive starting lb for a 2nd round pick. A lot of people were asking the nfl to look into the trade because they thought there was something dirty going on there. We got a sweet deal. I fail to see how that screwed us.
We got a sweet deal for our 2nd rounder. We got a SHITTY deal for our 1st rounder, which was a HIGH first rounder.
Which pick is more important to get a sweet deal on to grant the most success? [Reply]
That's the main thing. I don't even mind the Jackson pick (it's pretty obvious nobody wanted a top 3 pick this year) as much as I mind everything that led up to it. The Cassel trade, the decision to follow the herd and switch to a 3-4, everything. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Ultra Peanut:
That's the main thing. I don't even mind the Jackson pick (it's pretty obvious nobody wanted a top 3 pick this year) as much as I mind everything that led up to it. The Cassel trade, the decision to follow the herd and switch to a 3-4, everything.
This thread would have been started no matter who we picked, unless it was Sanchez. It was already locked an loaded just waiting to have the submit button pushed. [Reply]
Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins:
When sources are shot natively on 24, 30, and 60 Hz, it sure as **** does because you don't have to invent a frame out of anywhere.
Now go shove a florescent lightbulb up your ass.
Now I know you're a dumbass. The "native" shoot is irrelevant. You have some sort of engineering/science degree, really? In what? And spout shit on a BB? Wow! You're a genious! [Reply]
