ChiefsPlanet Mobile
Page 10 of 37
« First < 678910 1112131420 > Last »
Nzoner's Game Room>post all the haters posts here
Bearcat 10:28 AM 01-30-2023
Originally Posted by ChiTown:
NO ONE was talking about the refs until the 3rd and 9 fiasco......which ultimately resulted in a PUNT to the Bengals. What other calls heavily favoured the Chiefs? The Burrow grounding? Nope, that was the right call. The shove out of bounds when Mahomes has two feet in the white paint? Nope, that was the right call. The missed block in the back on the Punt Return? Yep, they could have called that for sure. So, one call = heavily favoured?
And on top of that, the refs could have ignored the holding that took points off the board for the Chiefs, or the taunting that's easily ignorance (even if it was right in front of the refs).

I know the retarded narrative is always "they have to make it look good!!!" and "they can't be too one sided!!!"... which is fucking lame when every losing team fans ever always says it was heavily one sided anyway.
[Reply]
chiefzilla1501 10:43 AM 01-30-2023
Originally Posted by ChiTown:
NO ONE was talking about the refs until the 3rd and 9 fiasco......which ultimately resulted in a PUNT to the Bengals. What other calls heavily favoured the Chiefs? The Burrow grounding? Nope, that was the right call. The shove out of bounds when Mahomes has two feet in the white paint? Nope, that was the right call. The missed block in the back on the Punt Return? Yep, they could have called that for sure. So, one call = heavily favoured?
I get it. We did the same thing when we lost in the regular season last year (also torberg). I’d say the volume of the calls toward the end favored us. It’s more about the volume of calls in a game where they mostly didn’t call much. But I generally agree… the block in the back is really the one big miss.

The irony is that the bengals probably don’t beat the ravens but for a missed blatant block in the back against the ravens on the 98 yard fumble return
[Reply]
carcosa 10:16 AM 01-30-2023
Originally Posted by straycash:
Can we take a moment to call a spade a spade, the refs heavily favoured KC, yes?
Cry more bitch lmao
[Reply]
Sassy Squatch 10:17 AM 01-30-2023
Originally Posted by straycash:
Can we take a moment to call a spade a spade, the refs heavily favoured KC, yes?
Grossly incompetent, yes. Favored, no.
[Reply]
straycash 10:31 AM 01-30-2023
How about the timing of the calls, still no bias towards KC? Try to answer as an observer of the game, remove the fandom for a few.
[Reply]
tredadda 10:32 AM 01-30-2023
Originally Posted by straycash:
How about the timing of the calls, still no bias towards KC? Try to answer as an observer of the game, remove the fandom for a few.
Such as? Which ones in particular are you referring to?
[Reply]
ChiTown 10:35 AM 01-30-2023
Originally Posted by tredadda:
Such as? Which ones in particular are you referring to?
That's exactly what I'm trying to understand. Which calls are we talking about? I assume it's the ones that were called, and not the ones that were missed, especially all the missed holding calls on the Bengals OL and the DB's who were raping Kelce all night?
[Reply]
straycash 10:36 AM 01-30-2023
Originally Posted by tredadda:
Such as? Which ones in particular are you referring to?
All of those in the 2'nd half, minus the roughing call

I see the consensus is no. Carry on
[Reply]
tredadda 10:40 AM 01-30-2023
Originally Posted by straycash:
All of those in the 2'nd half, minus the roughing call

I see the consensus is no. Carry on
Seriously? Please highlight specific ones, not just your generic response. Outside of possibly the block in the back on the Moore return show instances where KC benefited from calls that the Bengals did not.
[Reply]
straycash 10:50 AM 01-30-2023
Originally Posted by tredadda:
Seriously? Please highlight specific ones, not just your generic response. Outside of possibly the block in the back on the Moore return show instances where KC benefited from calls that the Bengals did not.
Generic response is all you will ever get, call it a tap out. One final thought, convince me you wouldn't be nitpicking every call/non call if you switched teams just for this game. :-) worth mentioning I see.. Bengals fan I am not
[Reply]
ChiTown 10:44 AM 01-30-2023
Originally Posted by straycash:
All of those in the 2'nd half, minus the roughing call

I see the consensus is no. Carry on
If you can't be more specific that that, then maybe it's a "you" problem. The ol' generic "all of those in the 2nd half" makes you sound like an uniformed fan.
[Reply]
Molitoth 10:37 AM 01-30-2023
Originally Posted by tredadda:
Such as? Which ones in particular are you referring to?
They can't name anything other than a missed holding call or a block in the back.

Calls get missed all game. It's the calls that remove turnovers and TD's that are detrimental.

The Chiefs got many of those....


Anyone complaining about the refs here is reaching for excuses.
[Reply]
tredadda 10:45 AM 01-30-2023
Originally Posted by Molitoth:
They can't name anything other than a missed holding call or a block in the back.

Calls get missed all game. It's the calls that remove turnovers and TD's that are detrimental.

The Chiefs got many of those....


Anyone complaining about the refs here is reaching for excuses.
Those are my personal favorites. “The Chiefs were holding all game and it wasn’t called”!!!!! Except for when Pacheco’s first half TD run was called back for holding. Oh and apparently only the Chiefs held all game. The Bengals OLine played an immaculate game except for a few times when they held and those were called every time by “biased” refs.
[Reply]
rico 10:34 AM 01-30-2023
So I own this website/social media outlet called “The Pin Doctors,” which is about wrestling 90% of the time, but I’ve been just gravitating to posting whatever I want to discuss nowadays. I’ve got it up to 33K followers on Facebook and in the last 28 days, my articles have reached 7.5 million people… it’s getting huge and I don’t know what to do about it. Anyways, a new thing I’ve been doing the past month is honoring sports referees and giving them shout-outs… holy cow there was a longing for THAT community in terms of wanting recognition for what they do… And I don’t blame them. It’s a thankless job. But yeah, every story I’ve posted on a ref this past month has been a hit.

So naturally, last night, I wrote one of these ref tributes to Ronald Torbert… and holy cow I’ve never upset people so badly… these Cincinnati fans are CRAZY. :-) People are either in that thread laughing their asses off or pissing and moaning.

If you want to read the comments, I’ll post the link for you. You may need to follow the page first to see comments. I don’t know what my settings are.

HERE IS THE LINK:

https://www.facebook.com/10002051431...e8wml/?app=fbl


HERE IS WHAT I WROTE IN THE ARTICLE:



I’d like to give a well-deserved, long-overdue shout-out to NFL referee, Ronald Torbert!!

Ronald began his officiating journey in 2010 as a line-judge and since then has made consistent gains in his career. In 2014 he became an NFL referee! He is one of only eight African-American referees in NFL history, after Johnny Grier, Mike Carey, Jerome Boger, and Don Carey; he preceded Shawn Smith, Adrian Hill, and Tra Blake. Prior to this year’s postseason, Torbert’s best accomplishment was being named the alternate referee for Super Bowl LIII!!! And well, he’s had an even BETTER year this year… On January 25, 2022, Torbert was named the referee for Super Bowl LVI. Just tonight, he officiated the AFC Championship game between the KC Chiefs and Cincinnati Bengals.

Ronald attained his law degree from Michigan State University and attended Harvard Law School earning a Juris Doctor degree.

Way to accomplish your dream of officiating in the Super Bowl, Ronald! You have reached the pinnacle!
[Reply]
Eleazar 10:40 AM 01-30-2023
Crying about the referees is the domain of losers. It’s loser mentality. Always has been. Either you got the job done or you didn’t.
[Reply]
Page 10 of 37
« First < 678910 1112131420 > Last »
Up