Because we are the Chiefs
[Reply]

because no one was near him
[Reply]

Because it wasn't directed at a single player...
[Reply]

So....someone has to be "near" taunting? Or it has to be directed at one player???
[Reply]

If a tree taunts in the woods and there is no one to hear it, was it really taunting?
[Reply]

He’s already missing a chromosome, they didn’t want to pile on.
[Reply]

They let the Ravens get away with a couple pretty crucial false starts. The Chiefs got away with some as well. I've seen it in other games as well. I don't know if they had a rules conference and decided to be less stringent on false starts?

They easily could've called PI on the 3rd down pass to Tyreek too. I mean if they're gonna call 2 illegal contact penalties on Mathieu where he barely touched the guy after 5 yards. I feel like they kinda called the game based on what the Ravens needed at the time to come back and make it a "nail biter". Kind of what everyone expected from Clete Blakeman and his crew of corruption.
[Reply]

Nobody actually knows the rules anymore. They are subjective are/aren't called for unknown reasons that are never explained.
[Reply]

So if Reek would have backflipped last week would have been no flag?
[Reply]

dude is going to break something one day
[Reply]

It wasn’t taunting. More celebration

Pretty dumb though. He could have hurt himself. I thought he landed pretty hard.
[Reply]

Who cares?

Wouldn't have changed the fact that Andy was going to go conservative and Clyde was going to fumble the game away.
[Reply]

Wish Jackson would of splashed water on him.
[Reply]

Wasn’t taunting.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
[Reply]