Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins:
So Belichick, despite being GM, isn't the guy who pulls the trigger on the pick?
So, if the pick works out, Scott Pioli gets credit despite not being the guy in charge. If they end up with Maroney, Chad Jackson, Ben Watson, or Daniel Graham, then it's Belichick's fault because he's in charge.
I love this tard logic.
Basically this board has boiled down to a street auction to see who can get to the front of the line to fluff a GM who has done nothing but make terrible moves from the day he was hired.
You talk like every opinion you have posted on this board has been gold.
There's a big difference between waiting and seeing what happens, and acting like a homocidal maniac because Pioli didn't follow the plan that you wanted. [Reply]
Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins:
So Belichick, despite being GM, isn't the guy who pulls the trigger on the pick?
So, if the pick works out, Scott Pioli gets credit despite not being the guy in charge. If they end up with Maroney, Chad Jackson, Ben Watson, or Daniel Graham, then it's Belichick's fault because he's in charge.
I love this tard logic.
Basically this board has boiled down to a street auction to see who can get to the front of the line to fluff a GM who has done nothing but make terrible moves from the day he was hired.
That's what it is, the Pioli fluff contest, he can do whatever and if you question it you are a bad fan. [Reply]
Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins:
So Belichick, despite being GM, isn't the guy who pulls the trigger on the pick?
So, if the pick works out, Scott Pioli gets credit despite not being the guy in charge. If they end up with Maroney, Chad Jackson, Ben Watson, or Daniel Graham, then it's Belichick's fault because he's in charge.
I love this tard logic.
Basically this board has boiled down to a street auction to see who can get to the front of the line to fluff a GM who has done nothing but make terrible moves from the day he was hired.
Who has said the bad picks are all Belichick? I certainly haven't, and I haven't seen any reputable poster on here say that.
Pioli and Belichick aren't perfect, but they're arguably the best in the league at what they do. To act like Pioli didn't play a huge role in building that Pats dynasty is downright laughable.
Acting like you know more than these guys and that they're building the team the wrong way is downright laughable, and right now the huge majority of this board is laughing at you. [Reply]
Originally Posted by SNR:
It's far more likely that Sanchez will be an elite NFL QB and that Dorsey will thrive in a 4-3 than it is that the Chiefs move to the 3-4 and Cassel will work out great.
Originally Posted by Mecca:
Trading for backup QB's you're familiar with then drafting a role player in the top 3 so you can shoehorn in your defensive scheme making last years top 5 pick mean nothing is not my idea of rebuilding.
Just rebuild the rebuild...they might aswell trade most of the team it's pretty obvious they aren't going with a scheme the players fits they are going to make players fit the scheme.
why the fuck would you build a defense that fits the existing players?
the team won two games last year. they had 10 sacks all year. those players SUCK ASS.
who cares if we replace them? they need replacing [Reply]
Don't forget that many, many people were creaming their jeans over the selections of Derrick Johnson and Glenn Dorsey, and so far those two haven't lived up to that particular hype. Maybe it was bad coaching or lack of talent around them (definitely bad coaching with Dorsey), but still, those two have not been anywhere near gamechangers. Could Jackson be a bust? Yes, but he could also be a very good player. I'll wait to see him on the field before tarding out over the pick. [Reply]