The interview was pretty good. I thought he did a solid job until he started crying at the end and trying to talk about his charity work and how much he loves his friend.
However, the most important part was his explanation of what he specifically meant with his words. And that part he completely whiffed on. He basically said he was referring to Brit Reid, and the fact that he's the only defensive coach that didn't get fired. That makes no sense. How is that an example of Reid trying to "fix" someone and it failing?
I really don't know all the history of Reid's kids. Don't really want to. But I know there were some criminal charges and drug stuff. I figured if Kietzman was going to explain this away it would be a reference to a still-living son who was still having trouble. If this is all he's got then it's beyond weak. [Reply]
Originally Posted by wazu:
I really don't know all the history of Reid's kids. Don't really want to. But I know there were some criminal charges and drug stuff.
As the opoid crisis has shown us all, even good kids raised right by good parents and role models can still devolve into drug addiction. Some did everything right to help stop the spiral down. No idea if that happened with Andy and dont care. I just dont need this TMZ level shit in my life.
Question: How can you fire Kietzman if he owns the radio station? [Reply]