Former federal prosecutor Sidney Powell, a Trump campaign lawyer, suggested in a Sunday interview that there is still more evidence coming out in President Donald Trump’s claims of voter fraud and irregularities.
“We’re getting ready to overturn election results in multiple states,” Powell said, saying that she has enough evidence of election fraud to launch a widespread criminal investigation.
“I don’t make comments without having the evidence to back it up,” she added, saying that elections software switched “millions of votes” from Trump to Democratic nominee Joe Biden.
Powell notably provided legal counsel to Gen. Michael Flynn in 2019. She was named to Trump’s legal team in the past several days.
Powell said a whistleblower came forward and said the elections software was designed to “rig elections,” saying that “he saw it happen in other countries,” referring to voting systems Dominion Voting Systems and Smartmatic, or perhaps other software and machines.
“We have so much evidence, I feel like it’s coming in through a fire hose,” Powell said, while noting that she won’t reveal the evidence that she has.
“They can stick a thumb drive in the [voting] machine, they can upload software to it even from the Internet … from Germany or Venezuela even,” she said, adding that operations “can watch votes in real-time” and “can shift votes in real-time,” or alleged bad actors can “remote access anything.”
“We’ve identified mathematically the exact algorithm they’ve used—and planned to use from the beginning” that allegedly switched votes to Biden, Powell remarked.
Powell also made reference to a 2019 investigation from Sens. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), as well as other Democratic lawmakers into Dominion Voting Systems, Election Systems & Software, and Hart InterCivic. The senators had expressed concerns about the security of the voting systems.
“(W)e have concerns about the spread and effect of private equity investment in many sectors of the economy, including the election technology industry—an integral part of our nation’s democratic process,” wrote the lawmakers in their letters to the firms about a year ago.
“These problems threaten the integrity of our elections and demonstrate the importance of election systems that are strong, durable, and not vulnerable to attack.”
Later in the Sunday morning interview, Powell said that her team has “detected voting irregularities that are inexplicable” in states where officials believe they have valid systems.
During the election, Republicans in the House were able to flip at least 11 seats while the GOP is poised to maintain control of the Senate. Some conservatives have questioned how such a voting pattern is possible for Biden to win the presidential election, let alone receive more votes than any other presidential candidate in American history, including President Barack Obama’s victory in 2008.
At this point to believe this election was stolen, you have to buy that Doug Ducey, Brian Kemp, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Alito, Amy Coney Barrett, Clarence Thomas, multiple Trump-appointed federal judges, and multiple state Republicans are all in on the scheme. [Reply]
SCOTUS cleared the slate to hear a much larger case related to the national interests.
- Just reported: U.S. Supreme Court will hear 'Texas' lawsuit against Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin 'voter fraud.' The case was added to the Supreme Court docket.
Louisiana just joined Texas in the suit as well. Others will likely follow.
Originally Posted by |Zach|:
At this point to believe this election was stolen, you have to buy that Doug Ducey, Brian Kemp, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Alito, Amy Coney Barrett, Clarence Thomas, multiple Trump-appointed federal judges, and multiple state Republicans are all in on the scheme.
Or or, this is what the Q wanted and the storm is coming. Right? Probably this. Yea totally storms and krakens and shit. [Reply]
Originally Posted by BanHam:
SCOTUS cleared the slate to hear a much larger case related to the national interests.
- Just reported: U.S. Supreme Court will hear 'Texas' lawsuit against Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin 'voter fraud.' The case was added to the Supreme Court docket.
Louisiana just joined Texas in the suit as well. Others will likely follow.
SCOTUS will "hear" this case just like they "heard" the PA case, in the sense that they will deny it 9-0 within the next week. [Reply]
Originally Posted by NinerDoug:
This Texas lawsuit looks like something Giuliani would cook up.
Texas has no standing to challenge how other states determine how to allocate their EC votes.
It's funny, Pubs called Gore a sore loser for wanting a re-count in one state.
Jesus Christ.
I'm sure all the states rights advocates will vociferously defend the integrity of Pennsylvania Georgia, et. al from this outside legal challenge. [Reply]
Originally Posted by BanHam:
SCOTUS cleared the slate to hear a much larger case related to the national interests.
- Just reported: U.S. Supreme Court will hear 'Texas' lawsuit against Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin 'voter fraud.' The case was added to the Supreme Court docket.
Louisiana just joined Texas in the suit as well. Others will likely follow.
Yeah, getting on the docket just means they filed it. I would expect Friday afternoon they deny taking this case as well. Defendents response due Thursday afternoon at 3. So it's possible they do it Thursday
Originally Posted by |Zach|:
At this point to believe this election was stolen, you have to buy that Doug Ducey, Brian Kemp, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Alito, Amy Coney Barrett, Clarence Thomas, multiple Trump-appointed federal judges, and multiple state Republicans are all in on the scheme.
Originally Posted by BanHam:
SCOTUS cleared the slate to hear a much larger case related to the national interests.
- Just reported: U.S. Supreme Court will hear 'Texas' lawsuit against Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin 'voter fraud.' The case was added to the Supreme Court docket.
Louisiana just joined Texas in the suit as well. Others will likely follow.
----------------------------------------
8 states have now joined the Texas SCOTUS lawsuit, arguing that the Equal Protection Clause has been violated in this election from state-to-state.
Louisiana was added earlier this afternoon.
Added: Arkansas, Alabama, Florida, Kentucky, Mississippi, South Carolina, South Dakota.
Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins:
I'm sure all the states rights advocates will vociferously defend the integrity of Pennsylvania Georgia, et. al from this outside legal challenge.
Apparently, you don't know what the Constitution says.
You lefties always twist it around, thinkin' you're throwing our earlier arguments back at us when you're really just making strawman arguments. [Reply]
Originally Posted by BanHam:
----------------------------------------
8 states have now joined the Texas SCOTUS lawsuit, arguing that the Equal Protection Clause has been violated in this election from state-to-state.
Louisiana was added earlier this afternoon.
Added: Arkansas, Alabama, Florida, Kentucky, Mississippi, South Carolina, South Dakota.
- Others will likely follow.
I was just wondering if that was going to an equal protection of the laws case when I was typing my last response. There's some precedent for that which was Bush v Gore. That's the argument Corsi said they needed to use over the other ones. [Reply]
