It’s good but nothing to get too excited about. The story is what suffers the most, too many ghostbusters introduced or kept on from previous films, there’s cool elements to this movie but it was just handled in the wrong way. I would agree in the 6-7 range. [Reply]
It's OK. Starts off kind of slow and then gets r e a l l y slow. They did a lot of cheesy, cheap, cliché, lazy storytelling stuff throughout the movie and that really weighs down the middle of the movie. It does eventually pick up and the last half hour or so is as good as the whole movie should have been. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Gravedigger:
It’s good but nothing to get too excited about. The story is what suffers the most, too many ghostbusters introduced or kept on from previous films, there’s cool elements to this movie but it was just handled in the wrong way. I would agree in the 6-7 range.
Seems like most movies in the last five (or more) years have been put together very poorly. [Reply]
Originally Posted by BWillie:
Why write movies when you can just have AI do it?
That's actually one thing that made me laugh during the Hollywood strike. They were so vocal about AI taking over. I'm not sure what exactly those writers and actors think they're providing now that's so valuable. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Frazod:
Afterlife was fantastic. I honestly liked it as much as the original. Even the kids didn't annoy me, which is highly unusual.
I'll watch this, but I'll wait until it streams.
Yeah, Afterlife is legit good. Across the board.
They even do fan service while still telling a story and just absolutely nailed the gut-punch at the end.
It's pretty much as well as you can do one of those combined sequel/reboots. [Reply]