Yeah, people are swinging too far the other way now on Clark. Acting like all he did in 2019 was get coverage sacks. 17 pressures that postseason, second only to Bosa, and did his job quite well in slowing the running game down. [Reply]
Originally Posted by dlphg9:
Frank Clark was not instrumental in getting us a SB and it is so damn annoying to hear that from you idiots time and time again. You just can't admit that Veach made a huge mistake getting the turd and have to over value some part of his time here.
Uhhhh. Wut?
He wasn’t all that good in the season but he was a fucking manimal in the playoffs. [Reply]
How the fuck does a “mixed reaction in the trade thread” prove anything? That means absolutely nothing in terms of how good Clark was in Seattle. Holy shit you’re fucking retarded.
“Get points for trying” implies the ultimate goal wasn’t accomplished. It was. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Superturtle:
Yeah, people are swinging too far the other way now on Clark. Acting like all he did in 2019 was get coverage sacks. 17 pressures that postseason, second only to Bosa, and did his job quite well in slowing the running game down.
He was great for that post season. But we can all admit that it looks like a lucky 3 game stretch and not representative of what he really is as a player.
Im appreciative of it but I also won't act like we have him 100mil and traded a 1st for him for 3 games. [Reply]
Originally Posted by -King-:
If he was THAT good, would there be a mixed reaction to it? Kinda simple.
This is fucking CP where half the people don’t have a fucking clue about the Chiefs, more or less the rest of the NFL. What a stupid fucking argument to make. [Reply]
Originally Posted by dlphg9:
Frank Clark was not instrumental in getting us a SB and it is so damn annoying to hear that from you idiots time and time again. You just can't admit that Veach made a huge mistake getting the turd and have to over value some part of his time here.
Originally Posted by staylor26:
This is fucking CP where half the people don’t have a fucking clue about the Chiefs, more or less the rest of the NFL. What a stupid fucking argument to make.
Ok sure. But what about when you Google "Frank Clark trade grade" and most if not all of the articles say that the Seahawks won and the very first article is "the Seahawks fleeced the chiefs"?
Or does everybody else outside of CP not count either? [Reply]
Clark had a 3 year stretch where he had 32 sacks in Seattle. He was easily one of the best edge rushers in the league at the time, but since there was a “mixed reaction” to the trade, that erases all of that. [Reply]
Clark had a 3 year stretch where he had 32 sacks in Seattle. He was easily one of the best edge rushers in the league at the time, but since there was a “mixed reaction” to the trade, that erases all of that.
I guess that's why Seahawks refused to trade him.... Oh wait.... [Reply]
Originally Posted by -King-:
Ok sure. But what about when you Google "Frank Clark trade grade" and most if not all of the articles say that the Seahawks won and the very first article is "the Seahawks fleeced the chiefs"?
Or does everybody else outside of CP not count either?
The opinions of a trade, which involves many factors outside of Clark’s ability/talent, doesn’t change the fact that Clark was a great player at the time.
Some people didn’t like the trade because of compensation. Many people hate the idea of trading draft picks for players that you have to pay. That’s a philosophical thing.
Some didn’t like it because they saw it as the Chiefs getting rid of 2 pass rushers only to turn around and trade for one.
None of that has anything to do with how good Clark was in Seattle you buttfucking moron. [Reply]
