Originally Posted by :
A 28-year-old Lake Charles-area woman faces a bevy of charges after Louisiana police said she repeatedly had sex with a 13-year-old boy who she met at the Bible camp where she was a teacher/aide.
According to the Sulphur Daily News, Heather Daughdrill initiated the relationship in June and it continued until a complaint was filed in October. After her arrest on November 29, police told the paper that Daughdrill would pick her victim up from school without his parents' knowledge and subject him to sexual encounters. Louisiana cops also reportedly found sexually explicit texts between Daughdrill and her victim.
Originally Posted by TinyEvel:
Here is the part that I find suspicious:
"Another former student, identified in the lawsuit as John Doe 7044, said he had heard rumors his freshman year that Gordon was allegedly abusing students, according to the lawsuit. During his senior year, he allegedly confronted Gordon in a text about the rumors; in return, Gordon allegedly told him to send her pictures of his penis and sent him nude photographs of herself. She allegedly sexually assaulted him the next day in the locker room and the abuse continued throughout his senior year until he cut off contract with her."
Seems like Dude hears this woman is banging students. He sends her a text (how'd he get her number?) saying "you banging students?"
She replies "yeah send me a dick pic, here's what I got (nudes attached)"
The next day they have sex.
Abuse? How did they get into the same room the next day? Naked? having sex? Supposedly he went to admonish her and try to convert her to Jesus and not having sex?
WTF this stinks.
(also here's an other alternate opinion just for balance)
But if you look at the basic rule of power and influence the legal argument is the boys had no ability to think clearly as they were subconsciously influenced by her position of authority. If it was a male teacher and girls we'd all be probably saying the dude needs his dick cut off.
Yeah....that's the point of the thread. It's a running joke that if the teachers actually hot then there's no way they "assaulted" a 17 year old male. But if they're ugly, they're guilty AF.
Oh and:
Guilty
I feel like we need more evidence, but if I have to base it on this alone I'm going not guilty. [Reply]
Originally Posted by TinyEvel:
Here is the part that I find suspicious:
"Another former student, identified in the lawsuit as John Doe 7044, said he had heard rumors his freshman year that Gordon was allegedly abusing students, according to the lawsuit. During his senior year, he allegedly confronted Gordon in a text about the rumors; in return, Gordon allegedly told him to send her pictures of his penis and sent him nude photographs of herself. She allegedly sexually assaulted him the next day in the locker room and the abuse continued throughout his senior year until he cut off contract with her."
Seems like Dude hears this woman is banging students. He sends her a text (how'd he get her number?) saying "you banging students?"
She replies "yeah send me a dick pic, here's what I got (nudes attached)"
The next day they have sex.
Abuse? How did they get into the same room the next day? Naked? having sex? Supposedly he went to admonish her and try to convert her to Jesus and not having sex?
WTF this stinks.
(also here's an other alternate opinion just for balance)
But if you look at the basic rule of power and influence the legal argument is the boys had no ability to think clearly as they were subconsciously influenced by her position of authority. If it was a male teacher and girls we'd all be probably saying the dude needs his dick cut off.
Yeah the power balance means something. But clearly she wasn't shoving these kids up against a wall and "raping" them. I think rape is being used here in the term of any sex with minors. Do we know how old she was at the time? I guess she must have been in her twenties, which removes any gray area like a 19-year-old with a 17-year-old.
But the size/strength imbalance matters too. A male coach can intimidate female players with implicit threats of physical violence and the whole power imbalance thing. Obviously these football players could just shove her onto her ass if they really wanted to get away.
My guess is they more or less liked it at the time, but it was also screwing with their heads, and got worse as time went on. I mean one went to a drive-in movie with her. That's what we call a date. [Reply]
Originally Posted by scho63:
Long ago I was so excited to click into this thread to see all the hotties fulfilling every young boys fantasy.
Somewhere along the way, these young men lowered their standards and are banging skanks like a fat ugly married man would do at last call in the bar.
These youngsters need to up their game and start scoring with some 8s, 9s and 10s.
Free internet porn has ruined everybody, but especially young teenaged kids. These women take advantage of that to get their own personal dopamine hits, because it's easier with kids addicted to porn than actually trying to relate with someone their own age. Apparently. [Reply]
