Originally Posted by googlegoogle:
You should look up your own past posts. You were one of those calling me stupid and saying nothing would happen. You were proven wrong.
So the Nuclear reactors have gone Chernobyl then [Reply]
Originally Posted by Donger:
Building 100s of more nuclear plants wouldn't completely remove our need for oil. Not even close.
Converting cars to total electric would make a HUGE dent in oil needs. Still need coal and nuclear, but it is a much more sane argument than drill here drill now. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Dave Lane:
Converting cars to total electric would make a HUGE dent in oil needs. Still need coal and nuclear, but it is a much more sane argument than drill here drill now.
I don't see the problem with drilling for oil on our on soil. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Donger:
Building 100s of more nuclear plants wouldn't completely remove our need for oil. Not even close.
What, we can run cars, planes and trains on nuclear power?!?
About a year ago I listened to a program where one expert said that to meet just our electrical power needs, we'd need to complete one nuclear power plant every two weeks for the next 28 years. Something absurd like that.
And on top of that is locomotive (of all types) needs.
Originally Posted by googlegoogle:
Don't you agree it's surpassed 3 mile island?
Considering that following me around the day after I had Taco Bell for dinner is substantially worse than what happened at 3 Mile Island, what is your point? [Reply]