I mean, those 2 movies weren't his best work, but they're still better than 99% of the shit that Hollywood puts out. I thoroughly enjoyed both. [Reply]
I mean, those 2 movies weren't his best work, but they're still better than 99% of the shit that Hollywood puts out. I thoroughly enjoyed both.
Excluding Home Alone 4, I'm not sure there is a movie I've enjoyed watching less in the last 2 years than TENET. It was an absolute mess with regards to the audio-visual and storytelling departments. Dunkirk was just boring and (saw it in IMAX) horribly loud. He really needs to clean up his act on the audio front, many of his films have barely audible dilogue with his crap sound mixing. Sorry, I know it's not the thread for it, but he's come an embarrassingly long way away from his Memento days.
Denis Villeneuve, not Nolan, should be getting the kind of cult-like following for gorgeous heady movies. [Reply]
I really liked Dunkirk and Nolan's capacity to put WWII visuals on the screen.
But this is a very different endeavor. I read the General and the Genius (not Genious btw) about the Manhattan project focusing on Oppenheimer and Groves. Whatever you might think about the book, the story of Oppenheimer is a very very complicated and nuanced story. It is difficult for scholars who have spent a lifetime studying the Manhattan project and subsequent events and interviews.
Any artistic license taken would seriously impact a well documented life executing well documented events. It's not like the Dunkirk movie that had relatively faceless characters that he could use in whatever way he wanted to tell the story.
FWIW, the General and the Genius is a really good book for those interested. There are a lot of touchy subjects it does a good job of navigating them fairly and (IMO) objectively. And some of them are pretty serious, like how Stalin knew about the bomb before Truman at Potsdam.
All that is difficult to tell in an anthology of books, much less in a feature film.
But Nolan has earned the rope to hang himself. [Reply]
I'm a Nolan junkie, so I'm in alone for that. But Cillian Murphy is almost criminally underrated as an actor (or at least he was before Peaky Blinders), so those two together? Shiiiiiiitt. Done and done. [Reply]
I thought it was a lesser effort by Nolan, but still better than nearly all the muck Hollywood burps out. The story was choppy (by his standards) and the sound was WAY too loud in the theaters, but yeah, would definitely watch again.
I need to re-watch Tenet and see what a second viewing does for me. I liked it pretty well, but I think it might get better when you have a feel for it going in. [Reply]