Originally Posted by staylor26:
With everybody in the media at the Chiefs throats all offseason about the Chiefs keeping both Hill and Hunt despite the tapes there’s no ****ing way they would’ve traded for Clark too.
Seriously, how ****ing dumb do you have to be to not understand this. The fact that they did the right thing with Hunt gave them the ability to make this move. If they didn’t, there’s no way they could do it without making those situations even worse.
Even if that is true, which it probably isn't, who would give a shit? [Reply]
Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla:
You very clearly don't "need" evidence for any of your takes.
Way to move the goalposts, though. Previously, your only concern was with domestic violence, which the Patriots very clearly have zero issue with. Now, it's very specific violence with very specific evidence of that violence. Given that those names were off the top of my head, I have no idea how many hit women (it's probably at least TWO of them) or how many include videos.
I’m not moving goalposts you fucking moron. I thought it was common knowledge that violence against women (especially with tapes attached) is the thing that causes the most public outrage. Nobody gives a fuck about the other stuff. Hunt wouldn’t have been cut if he did something those guys did. Shit, he wouldn’t have even been cut if it were a guy. It wouldn’t even be a story for longer than a day. Those situations are clearly not relevant, but you’re too dense to see that. [Reply]
It’s like some of you don’t even get that Clark was traded before the Chiefs and the world even heard the audio tapes. The Tyreek situation wasn’t even remotely comparable to Hunt’s until that happened.
Did you guys just start paying attention to this kind of shit? It’s not a coincidence that Hunt was released after the tape was, and Hill wasn’t suspended until after his audio tape was released.
That tells you all you need to know. Of course the Chiefs don’t care. It’s all a response to the public outrage. And in the case with Hunt, he was a fucking RB who also lied to them about the whole thing and they were completely blindsided. [Reply]
Originally Posted by staylor26:
One of the obvious differences being that Hunt was actually proven guilty on tape, while there’s very little evidence at all in Tyreek’s situation?
How did nobody in the comments tweet that to him.
Basically he's saying some violence is ok, while other violence isn't?
Well which is it you virtue signaling chuckle fuck?
Originally Posted by staylor26:
One of the obvious differences being that Hunt was actually proven guilty on tape, while there’s very little evidence at all in Tyreek’s situation?
How did nobody in the comments tweet that to him.
What was the actual charge for which he was "proven guilty"? [Reply]
