I came cross this post on Facebook the other day and it kinda got me thinking on it. This is just some random dude and I know this is a Chiefs site so we’re likely to have some bias..
Most of the top comments were mentioning how the top rated teams couldn’t be considered the best since they didn’t win the Super Bowl.
I think you also have to consider at which point you’re taking them. Is it their peak? Is it a cumulative thing for the entire year?
Initially I wanted to move the 2013 Seahawks up a bit higher, but didn’t know who they could replace. And I also had to question whether placing the 2019 Chiefs there was a homer pick, but that was an amazing squad.
Idk. Lots of thoughts, but which team or teams do you think were the best of the bunch since the year 2000? [Reply]
Originally Posted by Why Not?:
Calling a team the "best" when it didn't win the championship that year is oxymoronic. The Chiefs should be #2 on that list.
Not really. No team has won every game in a season, they all lost to someone. I’m not sure that the fact that loss came in the Super Bowl should automatically disqualify a team from this list. [Reply]
