Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe:
Your D made its hay against Was, NYG, a Rodgers-less GB, and a Fangio'd™ Cowboys team.
Do you truly think that the first half of your season was the aberration and not the second half?
Dangit. I accidentally thumbed up this post.
What do you think is more of an aberration? The team that has been to 3 straight AFC championships and 2 straight Super Bowls losing 4 of their first 7 games, or that team going on a 5-game winning streak? [Reply]
Originally Posted by Pasta Little Brother:
KC had an off game and still led 22 to 3 until garbage time. The only time Denver stopped KC was when we shot ourselves in the foot.
This.
The game was never in doubt from the opening kickoff.
'But we did pretty much what we wanted' /KnowMo
And yet your team never led or controlled the game and the outcome was never in doubt.
What does that tell you about your team??
Think hard on that one before answering . . . . . . [Reply]
Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe:
Your D made its hay against Was, NYG, a Rodgers-less GB, and a Fangio'd™ Cowboys team.
Do you truly think that the first half of your season was the aberration and not the second half?
Yes.
The D is healthy now. During the first several games, they were constantly without 3-4 starters. Young players have gotten more comfortable. Chris Jones is back inside. Ingram joined the team. Sorenson's snaps were dramatically limited.
They were also experimenting with complicated coverage schemes over the first several games. They abandoned that strategy and simplified things.
Originally Posted by ptlyon:
Oh boy just saw Denver hosts the red hot Detroit lions Sunday
Easily a lose-able game for Dungver. Especially after just losing their SB last week. Have to see how they respond to a 12th straight loss to their Daddy’s. [Reply]
Originally Posted by RunKC:
Why the hell would Rodgers want to leave a top 5 roster, top 5 coach and the easiest division in football to play against Mahomes and Herbert?
Lmao he’s not going to Denver
Even with the cap going up to $208M next year, Green Bay is projected to be $38M over the cap in 2022. His time in GB is done. He'll be playing in Denver next year. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe:
Even with the cap going up to $210M next year, Green Bay is projected to be $38M over the cap in 2022. His time in GB is done. He'll be playing in Denver next year.
You said similar things about this year. Matter of fact, you say a lot of things that aren't true. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe:
Even with the cap going up to $210M next year, Green Bay is projected to be $38M over the cap in 2022. His time in GB is done. He'll be playing in Denver next year.
You said similar things about this year. Matter of fact, you say a lot of things that aren't true. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe:
Even with the cap going up to $208M next year, Green Bay is projected to be $38M over the cap in 2022. His time in GB is done. He'll be playing in Denver next year.
I've heard he never once intended to go to Denver. Fake news. He will never play in Pile High as a Donc. [Reply]
Ironically, the Chiefs ended any possibility of the Packers feeling confident in moving on from Rodgers. No way they feel good about that after Love’s first and only start.
Good luck outbidding the Dolphins for Watson! [Reply]
Originally Posted by staylor26:
Ironically, the Chiefs ended any possibility of the Packers feeling confident in moving on from Rodgers. No way they feel good about that after Love’s first and only start.
Good luck outbidding the Dolphins for Watson!
His contract voids in 2023 and he cannot be franchise tagged. They can't afford him in 2022. They're going to trade him. Andrew Brandt called it correctly all offseason and he has said all along that:
1. Aaron wouldn't retire in 2021
2. Aaron will report.
3. The Packers wouldn't trade him in 2021
4. The Packers are going to trade him in 2022.
He said this on draft night, in June, in July, in August and has repeated it multiple times during this season. Rodgers is getting traded. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe:
His contract voids in 2023 and he cannot be franchise tagged. They can't afford him in 2022. They're going to trade him. Andrew Brandt called it correctly all offseason and he has said all along that:
1. Aaron wouldn't retire in 2021
2. The Packers wouldn't trade him in 2021
3. The Packers are going to trade him in 2022.
He said this on draft night, in June, in July, in August and has repeated it multiple times during this season. Rodgers is getting traded.