Originally Posted by O.city:
I was gonna say, winning is a powerful deodorant here. The WR group wasn't good enough last year, they kinda won despite it not because of it.
Yea and I'd rather not keep doing that because A, lets give our HOF QB some legit weapons, B what happens when Kelce declines, because it will happen at some point. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Mecca:
Sure but sometimes beggars can't be choosers and if we go into the year with the WR group we have now we are asking for issues.
I dont disagree at all, i just think Theilen is closer to the bottom of the wishlist with the way this front office has maneuvered recently. [Reply]
Originally Posted by O.city:
Yes, again, as we've seen all the charts, Mahomes had the best QB'ing season in the history of the league.
Add another year on Kelce, some losses to the WR group, I'd prefer to not have to continually ask him to be THAT good.
They'll add to the group though so there's no point getting to upset about it.
You're also getting year 2 with Toney and Moore in the offense. Not to mention a lottery ticket in Ross. I'm confident that they add to it, but it's not as bad as people make it out to be either IMO.
They'll sign or trade for a guy, and draft a guy. [Reply]
Originally Posted by raybec 4:
There's a difference between being fine with a shitty group and bleating about how there are no options to get better.
I don't think they'll wanna bandaid the group together again though so I'm not too upset about any of these also ran 1 year deal guys getting scooped. There are plenty of those guys to be had if we want.
Originally Posted by Detoxing:
It was a shitty WR group. They had to trade for Toney mid season.
13 of Mahomes' 41 TD's went to WR's. That's shitty.
Yeah, we won a SB with a shitty WR group because Mahomes/Reid/Kelce.
Exactly, they won the superbowl with shitty WRs because they don't need them to be great. We would all love to have upgrades and I'm sure they're coming. [Reply]
I'm never going to say "XX position is going to be a problem" because Mahomes and Reid might just make that problem go away. But WR is a need, it was a poor group last year. I'd like it to be at least on par with that. We "need" another middling WR, probably 2 as a minimum, another middling run-stuffer, a situational SE with a bit of speed, a RT and a safety that can cover at least averagely. That seems like the shopping list. We can still legit get better in 2 or 3 areas compared to last year's roster. [Reply]