ChiefsPlanet Mobile
Page 20 of 21
« First < 101617181920 21 >
Patteeu Memorial Political Forum>Ivermectin Wins in India
0372 09:28 AM 08-14-2021
Proven and safe solution with a time tested alternative to the mRNA Experiment.


https://www.thedesertreview.com/opin...5e2519364.html

News of India's defeat of the Delta variant should be common knowledge. It is just about as obvious as the nose on one's face. It is so clear when one looks at the graphs that no one can deny it.

Yet, for some reason, we are not allowed to talk about it. Thus, for example, Wikipedia cannot mention the peer-reviewed meta-analyses by Dr. Tess Lawrie or Dr. Pierre Kory published in the American Journal of Therapeutics.

https://www.thedesertreview.com/opin...0b1f2ff67.html

Wikipedia is not allowed to publish the recent meta-analysis on Ivermectin authored by Dr. Andrew Hill. Furthermore, it is not allowed to say anything concerning www.ivmmeta.com showing the 61 studies comprising 23,000 patients which reveal up to a 96% reduction in death [prophylaxis] with Ivermectin.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk%3AIvermectin

One can see the bias in Wikipedia by going on the "talk" pages for each subject and reading about the fierce attempts of editors to add these facts and the stone wall refusals by the "senior" editors who have an agenda. And that agenda is not loyalty to your health.

The easy way to read the “talk” page on any Wikipedia subject is to click the top left “talk” button. Anyone can then review the editors’ discussions.

There is a blackout on any conversation about how Ivermectin beat COVID-19 in India. When I discussed the dire straits that India found itself in early this year with 414,000 cases per day, and over 4,000 deaths per day, and how that evaporated within five weeks of the addition of Ivermectin, I am often asked, "But why is there no mention of that in the news?"

Yes, exactly. Ask yourself why India’s success against the Delta variant with Ivermectin is such a closely guarded secret by the NIH and CDC. Second, ask yourself why no major media outlets reported this fact, but instead, tried to confuse you with false information by saying the deaths in India are 10 times greater than official reports.

https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsan...he-official-co

Perhaps NPR is trying so hard because NPR is essentially a government mouthpiece. The US government is “all-in” with vaccines with the enthusiasm of a 17th century Catholic Church “all-in” with a Geocentric Model of the Universe disputing Galileo. Claiming that India’s numbers are inaccurate might distract from the overwhelming success of Ivermectin.

But in the end, the truth matters. It mattered in 1616, and it matters in 2021.




The graphs and data from the Johns Hopkins University CSSE database do not lie. On the contrary, they provide a compelling trail of truth that no one can dispute, not even the NIH, CDC, FDA, and WHO.

Just as Galileo proved with his telescope that the earth was NOT the center of the Universe in 1616; today, the data from India shows that Ivermectin is effective, much more so than the vaccines. It not only prevents death, but it also prevents COVID infections, and it also is effective against the Delta Variant.

In 1616, you could not make up the telescopic images of Jupiter and its orbiting moons, nor could you falsify the crescent-shaped images of Venus and Mercury. These proved that the earth was NOT the center of the Universe – a truth the Catholic Church could not allow.

Likewise, the massive drop in cases and deaths in India to almost nothing after the addition of Ivermectin proved the drug's effectiveness. This is a truth that the NIH, CDC, and FDA cannot allow because it would endanger the vaccine policy.

Never mind that Ivermectin would save more lives with much less risk, much less cost, and it would end the pandemic quickly.

Let us look at the burgundy-colored graph of Uttar Pradesh. First, allow me to thank Juan Chamie, a highly-respected Cambridge-based data analyst, who created this graph from the JHU CSSE data. Uttar Pradesh is a state in India that contains 241 million people. The United States’ population is 331 million people. Therefore, Uttar Pradesh can be compared to the United States, with 2/3 of our population size.

This data shows how Ivermectin knocked their COVID-19 cases and deaths - which we know were Delta Variant - down to almost zero within weeks. A population comparable to the US went from about 35,000 cases and 350 deaths per day to nearly ZERO within weeks of adding Ivermectin to their protocol.

By comparison, the United States is the lower graph. On August 5, here in the good ol’ USA, blessed with the glorious vaccines, we have 127,108 new cases per day and 574 new deaths.

Let us look at the August 5 numbers from Uttar Pradesh with 2/3 of our population. Uttar Pradesh, using Ivermectin, had a total of 26 new cases and exactly THREE deaths. The US without Ivermectin has precisely 4889 times as many daily cases and 191 times as many deaths as Uttar Pradesh with Ivermectin.

It is not even close. Countries do orders of magnitude better WITH Ivermectin. It might be comparable to the difference in travel between using an automobile versus a horse and buggy.

Uttar Pradesh on Ivermectin: Population 240 Million [4.9% fully vaccinated]

COVID Daily Cases: 26

COVID Daily Deaths: 3

The United States off Ivermectin: Population 331 Million [50.5% fully vaccinated]

COVID Daily Cases: 127,108

COVID Daily Deaths: 574

Let us look at other Ivermectin using areas of India with numbers from August 5, 2021, compiled by the JHU CSSE:

Delhi on Ivermectin: Population 31 Million [15% fully vaccinated]

COVID Daily Cases: 61

COVID Daily Deaths: 2

Uttarakhand on Ivermectin: Population 11.4 Million [15% fully vaccinated]

COVID Daily Cases: 24

COVID Daily Deaths: 0

Now let us look at an area of India that rejected Ivermectin.

https://www.thehindu.com/news/nation...le34561235.ece

Tamil Nadu announced they would reject Ivermectin and instead follow the dubious USA-style guidance of using Remdesivir. Knowing this, you might expect their numbers to be closer to the US, with more cases and more deaths. You would be correct. Tamil Nadu went on to lead India in COVID-19 cases.

https://www.thedesertreview.com/opin...78d521f9a.html

Tamil Nadu continues to suffer for its choice to reject Ivermectin. As a result, the Delta variant continues to ravage their citizens while it was virtually wiped out in the Ivermectin-using states. Likewise, in the United States, without Ivermectin, both the vaccinated and unvaccinated continue to spread the Delta variant like wildfire.

https://www.cnn.com/2021/08/05/healt...day/index.html

Tamil Nadu off Ivermectin: Population 78.8 Million [6.9% fully vaccinated]

COVID Daily Cases: 1,997

COVID Daily Deaths: 33

Like the JHU CSSE data, Galileo's telescope did not lie either, and the truth can usually be found in plain sight. Ivermectin works, and it works exceedingly well. Harvard-trained virologist Dr. George Fareed and his associate, Dr. Brian Tyson of California's Imperial Valley, have saved 99.9% of their patients with a COVID Cocktail that includes Ivermectin. They have released versions of their new book published in the Desert Review that everyone should read.

https://www.thedesertreview.com/opin...d67e94c25.html

I could talk about how every one of my patients who used Ivermectin recovered rapidly, about my most recent case who felt 90% better within 48 hours of adding the drug, but I won't. I could write about how Wikipedia censors more than Pravda, about how you should always read the "talk" section of EVERY Wikipedia article to go behind the scenes and understand what the editors DO NOT want you to read, but I will refrain.

I could write about VAERS and how it is so much easier to navigate by following Open VAERS or how Wikipedia has unfairly portrayed Dr. Peter McCullough, one of the world's sharpest and most credible doctors. But I will hold back.

https://www.openvaers.com/

I could also discuss our current cancer treatment system's dangers and how chemotherapy and radiation stimulate cancer stem cells and cancer recurrence. About how this information has been suppressed and how the addition of repurposed drug cocktails can help prevent this, but I digress.

https://www.amazon.com/Surviving-Can.../dp/0998055425

I could recite the history of early outpatient treatment of COVID-19 with repurposed drugs, including Ivermectin, with all the specifics, and EXACTLY WHY this lifesaving information has been censored, but instead, I will leave researching these topics to each of you readers as individuals.

https://www.amazon.com/Ivermectin-Wo.../dp/1737415909

Because you already know what will happen if you simply sit back and swallow what the media are feeding you. You MUST question what the government tells you, and always DO YOUR OWN research.

Following the 1616 Inquisition of Galileo, the Pope banned all books and letters that argued the sun was the center of the Universe instead of the Earth. Similarly, today, the FDA and WHO have banned any use of Ivermectin for COVID outside of a clinical trial.

https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consum...event-covid-19

https://www.who.int/news-room/featur...linical-trials

YouTube and Wikipedia both consider Ivermectin for COVID as heresy.

“YouTube doesn’t allow content that spreads medical misinformation that contradicts local health authorities or the World Health Organization’s (WHO) medical information about COVID-19… Treatment misinformation: claims that Ivermectin is an effective treatment for COVID-19.”

Wikipedia defines heresy as: “any belief or theory that is strongly at variance with established beliefs or customs, in particular the accepted beliefs of a church or religious organization. The term is usually used in reference to violations of important religious teachings, but is also used of views strongly opposed to any generally accepted ideas. A heretic is a proponent of heresy.”

Heresy is disagreeing with the government, or their health authority, even if they are all wrong and even if their policies harm people. Today we no longer call it heresy; it is labeled as misinformation.

Galileo was found guilty of heresy and sentenced on June 22, 1633, to formal imprisonment, although this was commuted to house arrest, under which he remained for the rest of his life.

On August 7, 2021 Medpage Today published a new quiz, “Can COVID Misinformation Cost You Your Medical License?”

https://www.medpagetoday.com/quizzes/news-quiz/93943
[Reply]
Imon Yourside 01:12 PM 10-13-2021
Originally Posted by AdolfOliverBush:
Even if true (a big if), that would would be 3 deaths out of hundreds of millions of administered doses.

The story about the German pathologist has been mentioned here several times, always with nothing to back up the claim.
The goalposts will keep moving cuz narrative
[Reply]
RaidersOftheCellar 01:42 PM 10-13-2021
Originally Posted by AdolfOliverBush:
Even if true (a big if), that would would be 3 deaths out of hundreds of millions of administered doses.

The story about the German pathologist has been mentioned here several times, always with nothing to back up the claim.
Rates of cancer, autoimmune disease and many other diseases completely unrelated to Covid have skyrocketed since vaccination started, but it's a "big if." Suuure, sure.

I fail to see how you've determined that the (world renowned) pathologist's work is "100% false." Enlighten me.
[Reply]
AdolfOliverBush 02:56 PM 10-13-2021
Originally Posted by Imon Yourside:
The goalposts will keep moving cuz narrative
From 0 vaccines deaths to 3...maybe...out of hundreds of millions of shots. "Narrative" :-)

Originally Posted by RaidersOftheCellar:
Rates of cancer, autoimmune disease and many other diseases completely unrelated to Covid have skyrocketed since vaccination started, but it's a "big if." Suuure, sure.
Sounds like bullshit. Got a link?

Originally Posted by RaidersOftheCellar:
I fail to see how you've determined that the (world renowned) pathologist's work is "100% false." Enlighten me.
Got a link?
[Reply]
RaidersOftheCellar 03:38 PM 10-13-2021
Originally Posted by AdolfOliverBush:
From 0 vaccines deaths to 3...maybe...out of hundreds of millions of shots. "Narrative" :-)



Sounds like bullshit. Got a link?



Got a link?
https://alethonews.com/2021/09/29/ge...cine-injuries/

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/id...ated-patients/

https://www.israelnationalnews.com/N...ws.aspx/308664

You do understand that vaccine victim sites are blacklisted on Google, right? And victim groups/death reports are censored on social media? I guess you think that Pharma-owned media is going to report every suspected vaccine death to you?
[Reply]
RaidersOftheCellar 05:37 PM 10-13-2021
By Steve Kirsch's calculations, over 200,000 Americans have been killed by the jab so far. Millions injured.

Dr Peter McCullough has reported that troponin levels are elevated in many vaccinated patients (a marker for heart damage).

A top neurologist claims to have 2,000 reportable vaccine injuries in 2021, compared to zero in the last 11 years.

Canadian physician Charles Hoffe reported that 60% of his vaccinated patients have elevated D-dimer levels (indicative of blood clotting), and levels in many cases remained elevated for up to three months.

VAERS data (as of several weeks ago), shows that pulmonary embolism has been reported at 473 times higher than the normal incidence rate. Stroke, 326 times higher. Deep vein thrombosis, 264 times higher. Death, 58 times higher. Etc, etc.

Kirsch on if VAERS can determine causality:

The big disconnect, Kirsch points out, is that the CDC insists that VAERS, as an early warning system, cannot prove (or disprove) causality. Kirsch argues that this is false. The idea that VAERS cannot show causality is part of how and why the CDC can claim none of the deaths is attributable to the COVID shot.

To prove his point, Kirsch gives the following analogy: Suppose you give a two-dose vaccine. After the first dose, nothing happens, but after the second dose, people die within 24 hours of a deep vein thrombosis (DVT). When you look at the VAERS data, what you would find is no reports associated with the first dose, and a rash of deaths after the second dose, and all within the same timeframe and with the same cause of death.

According to the CDC, you cannot ascribe any causality at all from that. To them, it’s just random chance that everyone died after the second dose, and from the same condition, and not the first dose or from another condition.

Kirsch argues that causality CAN be identified from this kind of data. It’s very difficult to come up with another explanation for why people die exactly 24 hours after their second dose.

For example, is it reasonable to assume that people with, say, undiagnosed heart conditions would die exactly 24 hours after getting a second dose of vaccine? Or that people with undiagnosed diabetes would die exactly 24 hours after their second dose?

Why not after the first dose, or two months after the second dose, or any other random number of hours or days, or for other random cause of death? Why would people randomly die of the same condition at the exact same time, over and over again?



I could go on all day and post a bunch of horror show vaccine victim sites, but the bottom line is this: Anyone who ignores all such info because the CDC isn't admitting causation has absolutely zero common sense.
[Reply]
AdolfOliverBush 08:28 AM 10-14-2021
Did you really just cite lifesitenews.com? You're going full BEP, which is to say you're 100% wrong.
[Reply]
RaidersOftheCellar 09:15 AM 10-14-2021
Originally Posted by AdolfOliverBush:
Did you really just cite lifesitenews.com? You're going full BEP, which is to say you're 100% wrong.
Sure...cherry pick one source that you've been programmed to believe is lacking in credibility, while ignoring all other info. A solid approach for any truthseeker.

Many of you will have to find out the hard way how dangerous these shots really are.

Every subsequent shot will do more damage.
[Reply]
AdolfOliverBush 09:17 AM 10-14-2021
Originally Posted by RaidersOftheCellar:
Sure...cherry pick one source that you've been programmed to believe is lacking in credibility, while ignoring all other info. A solid approach for any truthseeker.

Many of you will have to find out the hard way how dangerous these shots really are.

Every subsequent shot will do more damage.
Wrong. Kirsch is either a lying or insane.
[Reply]
RaidersOftheCellar 09:22 AM 10-14-2021
Originally Posted by AdolfOliverBush:
Wrong. Kirsch is either a lying or insane.
You think that every doctor is lying about the trends they're seeing? Why? Do they hate their careers?

If I took the time, I could easily compile over a hundred reports of healthy young people (teens-30s) who died very shortly after vaccination. But since the CDC tells you there's no proof of causation, you believe there isn't, right?
[Reply]
AdolfOliverBush 09:32 AM 10-14-2021
Originally Posted by RaidersOftheCellar:
You think that every doctor is lying about the trends they're seeing? Why? Do they hate their careers?

If I took the time, I could easily compile over a hundred reports of healthy young people (teens-30s) who died very shortly after vaccination. But since the CDC tells you there's no proof of causation, you believe there isn't, right?
160,000 people die every day, even when there is no pandemic. well over a billion (closer to 2 billion IIRC) people have been vaccinated, so naturally many people who die will have received a vaccine recently.
[Reply]
RaidersOftheCellar 10:51 AM 10-14-2021
Originally Posted by AdolfOliverBush:
160,000 people die every day, even when there is no pandemic. well over a billion (closer to 2 billion IIRC) people have been vaccinated, so naturally many people who die will have received a vaccine recently.
Why would doctors and other medical professionals risk their licenses and careers to "lie" about what's happening?

No...healthy, young people don't just die suddenly. And no, it's not coincidental that a bunch of people are having serious heart problems/strokes/blood clots almost immediately after getting jabbed.
[Reply]
AdolfOliverBush 12:04 PM 10-14-2021
Originally Posted by RaidersOftheCellar:
Why would doctors and other medical professionals risk their licenses and careers to "lie" about what's happening?

No...healthy, young people don't just die suddenly. And no, it's not coincidental that a bunch of people are having serious heart problems/strokes/blood clots almost immediately after getting jabbed.
We're not going to change each others' mind, so we'll just have to wait and see. If what you say is true, we won't be able to walk down a sidewalk without tripping on a corpse. Time will tell.
[Reply]
lawrenceRaider 12:11 PM 10-14-2021
Originally Posted by RaidersOftheCellar:
Why would doctors and other medical professionals risk their licenses and careers to "lie" about what's happening?

No...healthy, young people don't just die suddenly. And no, it's not coincidental that a bunch of people are having serious heart problems/strokes/blood clots almost immediately after getting jabbed.
Young "healthy" people drop dead all the damn time. Do you not watch the news and see how many teens die each year in sports?
[Reply]
RaidersOftheCellar 12:16 PM 10-14-2021
Originally Posted by AdolfOliverBush:
We're not going to change each others' mind, so we'll just have to wait and see. If what you say is true, we won't be able to walk down a sidewalk without tripping on a corpse. Time will tell.
Believe it or not, I don't take these positions for attention. I believe what I believe based on the opinions of a slew of experts and mounting evidence.

Just trying to do what little I can to help people avoid making what could be a terrible decision.
[Reply]
RaidersOftheCellar 12:19 PM 10-14-2021
Originally Posted by lawrenceRaider:
Young "healthy" people drop dead all the damn time. Do you not watch the news and see how many teens die each year in sports?
Just a coincidence that the rate of myocarditis in vaccinated teenagers is 120 times higher than expected, I'm sure.
[Reply]
Page 20 of 21
« First < 101617181920 21 >
Up