ChiefsPlanet Mobile
Page 110 of 372
« First < 1060100106107108109110 111112113114120160210 > Last »
Patteeu Memorial Political Forum>911 was an inside job.
Taco John 12:06 AM 02-09-2006
After watching this, I am once and for all convinced that it was an inside job...

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...81991288263801


The evidence is way too strong.
[Reply]
patteeu 12:23 PM 08-18-2008
Originally Posted by irishjayhawk:
LETTERMAN: How are things going in Afghanistan now?

MCCAIN: I think were doing fine . I think well do fine. The second phase if I could just make one, very quickly the second phase is Iraq. There is some indication, and I dont have the conclusions, but some of this anthrax may and I emphasize may have come from Iraq.




By insinuated it was my way of saying he covered has ass "oh, I emphasize may but I'm still going to put it out there for you to think about."
Thanks for the quote. So yes, he even emphasizes the fact that he's just speculating.
[Reply]
Programmer 12:24 PM 08-18-2008
Originally Posted by Taco John:
Here you go Dopey...

Originally Posted by Taco John
I'll tell you what I think: I think inside job means that someone (or potentially multiple someones, though it only takes one) on "the inside" was a participant.


I can't believe how much credit I've given you in the past. You're proving to be just as dopey as Kotter.

Shame on me.
You think....You aren't thinking, you are speculating. What proof do you have of any of your speculation? You don't have proof. I'm thinking that the more you post the more people will see that you are incapable of coherent thought.
[Reply]
Programmer 12:25 PM 08-18-2008
Originally Posted by Taco John:
No, I don't spend all that much time embarassing dopes and making themselves look like contorting fools. But I'm efficient enough at work to find time to squeeze it in now and again.
Seems like you are here 24/7. I think your employer might think differently.
[Reply]
patteeu 12:33 PM 08-18-2008
Originally Posted by Taco John:
I'm not asking for a link from the NY Times. I'm asking for one from here. I sure as hell know that there was no one here daring to say that the Anthrax attack was a threat from inside our own government.
Almost everyone who had basic knowledge of the anthrax case already suspected that there was an inside connection of some kind. I don't know what people from here posted about, but I presume that most of them are competent enough to have been up to speed on the story.

Your 9/11 ideas, on the other hand, are pretty far out there, IMO.
[Reply]
Donger 12:36 PM 08-18-2008
Originally Posted by Taco John:
Here you go Dopey...




I can't believe how much credit I've given you in the past. You're proving to be just as dopey as Kotter.

Shame on me.
You'll either answer or you won't. I can't help that. So, again:

Do you think that the fact that Bruce Ivins worked for the USAMRIID prove in any that the anthrax attacks were inside government jobs?
[Reply]
Taco John 12:51 PM 08-18-2008
Originally Posted by Programmer:
Seems like you are here 24/7. I think your employer might think differently.
Tom, I just got promoted to Director of Marketing amidst layoffs at my company. What do you suppose that tells you about what my employer thinks of me?
[Reply]
Taco John 12:55 PM 08-18-2008
Originally Posted by Donger:
You'll either answer or you won't.
I already did answer, quite clearly.


Originally Posted by :
Do you think that the fact that Bruce Ivins worked for the USAMRIID prove in any that the anthrax attacks were inside government jobs?

"Inside government job?"

What does this mean? I've never seen this phrase until you just recently introduced it.

In any case, I'm not going to speculate between an inside job, and an inside government job. That part is immaterial to me, and is instead relevant for investigators who have access and can determine whether or not it's an inside job or an inside government job. The only part that concerns me is the "inside" part.
[Reply]
KingPriest2 12:57 PM 08-18-2008
can't play the video where can you find it.
[Reply]
KingPriest2 12:58 PM 08-18-2008
Originally Posted by Taco John:
Tom, I just got promoted to Director of Marketing amidst layoffs at my company. What do you suppose that tells you about what my employer thinks of me?

That you are a sucker
[Reply]
Stinger 01:04 PM 08-18-2008
Originally Posted by Taco John:
Tom, I just got promoted to Director of Marketing amidst layoffs at my company. What do you suppose that tells you about what my employer thinks of me?
It was an "inside job" and you had something on your employer?
[Reply]
Donger 01:06 PM 08-18-2008
Originally Posted by Taco John:
I already did answer, quite clearly.





"Inside government job?"

What does this mean? I've never seen this phrase until you just recently introduced it.

In any case, I'm not going to speculate between an inside job, and an inside government job. That part is immaterial to me, and is instead relevant for investigators who have access and can determine whether or not it's an inside job or an inside government job. The only part that concerns me is the "inside" part.
How do you define "inside job"?
[Reply]
BigChiefFan 01:09 PM 08-18-2008
Dude, just ignore him. It's the old bait and switch and yet when he's cornered he crys foul.
[Reply]
banyon 01:21 PM 08-18-2008
Originally Posted by Taco John:
Tom, I just got promoted to Director of Marketing amidst layoffs at my company. What do you suppose that tells you about what my employer thinks of me?
Wait til Tom rats you out though.
[Reply]
Taco John 01:29 PM 08-18-2008
Originally Posted by Donger:
How do you define "inside job"?
You really need this definition again? This is the third time I've given it to you in this discussion:

Inside job: a job in which a participant (or multiple participants) are on "the inside" or have "insider access." Like a bank teller who plots a bank robbery.

Originally Posted by Taco John:
I'll tell you what I think: I think inside job means that someone (or potentially multiple someones, though it only takes one) on "the inside" was a participant.

Originally Posted by Taco John:
"Oooooh! I get it! An inside job is when someone on the inside is a part of it!"

/lightbulb




It's kind of a self-explanitory definition. You shouldn't have to be given the definition one time, let alone three.
[Reply]
irishjayhawk 01:52 PM 08-18-2008
Originally Posted by patteeu:
Thanks for the quote. So yes, he even emphasizes the fact that he's just speculating.
You don't find that to be an interesting/conspicuous coincidence, in hindsight? If that was flying around Congress at the time deciding to go to war, it's pretty easy to see why they would be so convinced.

Likewise, all fox news did was publish a bogus story about Obama being a Muslim and people took it hook line and sinker. All it takes is a "emphasis" like McCain did on the Letterman show to put it into the public's mind.
[Reply]
Page 110 of 372
« First < 1060100106107108109110 111112113114120160210 > Last »
Up