Originally Posted by GloucesterChief:
They saved more money on restructure than by cutting him so.:-)
No they didn't.
But keep slurping that nonsense up and flat-ass ignoring the math.
Some idiot on Arrowhead Pride will gladly feed you bad numbers anytime you'd like.
The Chiefs took on around $8 million in additional and unnecessary liabilities over the next 2 years by restructuring him vs. cutting him. The didn't save shit.
This is going to become the "he's just doing his job" memorial nonsensical justification for Frank Clark's bullshit all season, isn't it? [Reply]
At what point can we officially put Frank Clark in the infamous list of all time chiefs hated players? Build him a statue next to Cassell, the kicker that shall not be named, and grbac . ...is eric winston in that group? Todd Blackledge? [Reply]
Originally Posted by saphojunkie:
The same people complaining that Clark is overpaid are also complaining that the Chiefs saved $1.25M on him not showing up in June.
I mean he should have never had the opportunity to earn that in the first place... Him not coming to camp just reinforces that. [Reply]
Originally Posted by irafreak:
At what point can we officially put Frank Clark in the infamous list of all time chiefs hated players? Build him a statue next to Cassell, the kicker that shall not be named, and grbac . ...is eric winston in that group? Todd Blackledge?
He’s not. Players like Dee Ford lost us a shot at our first super bowl appearance of our lives and Frank Clark was a key component to winning one for us a year later [Reply]
Originally Posted by DJ's left nut:
This is going to become the "he's just doing his job" memorial nonsensical justification for Frank Clark's bullshit all season, isn't it?
It's just as likely as your pretending to be in the minority of people here who think Frank Clark sucks and no longer want him on the team. [Reply]
Originally Posted by irafreak:
At what point can we officially put Frank Clark in the infamous list of all time chiefs hated players? Build him a statue next to Cassell, the kicker that shall not be named, and grbac . ...is eric winston in that group? Todd Blackledge?
He's not worth his contract but he's not on that level of suck. [Reply]
Originally Posted by saphojunkie:
The same people complaining that Clark is overpaid are also complaining that the Chiefs saved $1.25M on him not showing up in June.
My god.
I can't imagine giving up that kind of money not to be somewhere. [Reply]
I can't imagine giving up that kind of money not to be somewhere.
If your boss offered you a bonus of 5% of your annual income to be somewhere for a week, I think most would take it. That's not even considering that, in Frank's case, it's enough for me to retire comfortably. [Reply]
Originally Posted by kccrow:
If your boss offered you a bonus of 5% of your annual income to be somewhere for a week, I think most would take it. That's not even considering that, in Frank's case, it's enough for me to retire comfortably.
Originally Posted by irafreak:
At what point can we officially put Frank Clark in the infamous list of all time chiefs hated players? Build him a statue next to Cassell, the kicker that shall not be named, and grbac . ...is eric winston in that group? Todd Blackledge?
Lol no. Dude played a big part in our Championship run, especially against the Texans. Had a monster game sans Chris Jones. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Superturtle:
Lol no. Dude played a big part in our Championship run, especially against the Texans. Had a monster game sans Chris Jones.
People can whine, cry, and stomp their feet all they want but they don't win that title without him. [Reply]
Originally Posted by DJ's left nut:
No they didn't.
But keep slurping that nonsense up and flat-ass ignoring the math.
Some idiot on Arrowhead Pride will gladly feed you bad numbers anytime you'd like.
The Chiefs took on around $8 million in additional and unnecessary liabilities over the next 2 years by restructuring him vs. cutting him. The didn't save shit.
This is going to become the "he's just doing his job" memorial nonsensical justification for Frank Clark's bullshit all season, isn't it?
We got alot of shit going off on Veach for that dumbass move. When you watch Clark half ass it while the QB is running for a first down in a playoff game its truly baffling why he was brought back. Then he doesn't show up to mini camp. First it was he's working out on his own then it's a child being born. This guy has cashed in and then some. [Reply]
Originally Posted by TwistedChief:
It's just as likely as your pretending to be in the minority of people here who think Frank Clark sucks and no longer want him on the team.
Look at the reactions when it was announced he was coming back. People pretended we were saving a considerable amount of money by doing so. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Titty Meat:
Look at the reactions when it was announced he was coming back. People pretended we were saving a considerable amount of money by doing so.
Someone start a poll whether asking people are happy Frank Clark is on the team.
What's your best guess? 95% or so answering "no"? [Reply]
