Sean Smith is the fourth legislator to publicly support Frank White's veto "without ... documentation that is clear and unambiguous and signed by all parties."
As it stands this afternoon, the Chiefs and Royals do not have the votes to override White's veto for an April ballot. https://t.co/k3uenUsRRf
You hear a rumor once that doesn’t make much sense and you ignore it. You hear it 12 times and you start to take notice. It may not happen, but enough people keep telling me the #Royals are still in on a big free agent, so I wrote about it. https://t.co/SxgrX2w22W
How do you go from over 100 losses 106 to be exact from the previous season to competing for the division the next year? Crappy division I guess??:-) [Reply]
I find it hard to believe they'd go for someone like Chapman but the infield defense would be loaded. Seems like he'd be a bat pretty similar to Renfroe though. Urshela seems more like a Royals move. [Reply]
Chapman would certainly be a move that stresses KC isn’t operating like the old Royals days.
First, he’s going to cost a bunch.
Second, his offensive profile is low average, high OBP.
That’s very much not a Royals move.
I’d love it, though. An IF defense with Chapman, Witt, and Massey would be elite-elite. And they could trade Garcia at that point and get a decent return. [Reply]
Frank White is such a slimy motherfucker. I'm starting to think he's slimier than Sherman. Dude has no reason to veto this. Let the God damn voters vote for what they want. Slimy shit. [Reply]
