Teams represented at Odell Beckham Jr.'s private workout in Arizona today included the Panthers, Giants, Patriots, Rams, Cardinals, 49ers, Bills, Chiefs, Vikings, Browns and Ravens, per source.
Talked to a few people who attended Odell Beckham's workout. One noted how noticeably muscular Beckham looks now, likening him to a combination of Saquon Barkley and Deebo Samuel. Another said Beckham is simply a gifted athlete and that hasn't changed. Explosion was there.
Originally Posted by BossChief:
Why the **** does anyone want to cut MVS right now?
JFC.
A) we wouldnt have beat Cincy in the AFCCG without him. No second ring for Pat. This offseason has a completely different narrative without his performance in that game.
B) this WR room needs more talent, not less
C) MVS speed is an element of the offense that requires respect and does change how defenses play us.
He will likely play out his deal in KC.
You can't go by what the player did for me but what will the player do for me. IF Veach Brings in Hopkins/OBJ and Reid gives a larger role to Toney and Skyy I believe MVS is wasted Cap.
IF Veach doesn't bring in a expensive FA or trade for one then yes we must keep MVS. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Balto:
You can't go by what the player did for me but what will the player do for me. IF Veach Brings in Hopkins/OBJ and Reid gives a larger role to Toney and Skyy I believe MVS is wasted Cap.
IF Veach doesn't bring in a expensive FA or trade for one then yes we must keep MVS.
That's just not the case. MVS serves a specific and necessary role in the passing game, that isn't transferable to any other WR on the roster, unless that Ross kid (the tall fast one) is healthy, then maybe. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Balto:
I would only suggest or even thing MVS would be traded IF Veach brought in Hopkins or a higher cost FA. Otherwise yes we should keep him.
They're going to keep him even if they got Hopkins or someone else. This team needs more than 1 WR and not just top-flight but also depth. Cutting MVS would just be cutting off the nose to spite the face. [Reply]
I wonder why we're not bringing back Justin Watson. He's not going to fix our lack of a true #1 WR, but even then we've only got MVS, Skyy, and an oft-injured Toney. He was basically our 4th WR last year and it'd be really nice to have him back. Also, that way Toub can't complain about "all t3h n00bs on special teams!!!!" [Reply]
Originally Posted by RealSNR:
I wonder why we're not bringing back Justin Watson. He's not going to fix our lack of a true #1 WR, but even then we've only got MVS, Skyy, and an oft-injured Toney. He was basically our 4th WR last year and it'd be really nice to have him back. Also, that way Toub can't complain about "all t3h n00bs on special teams!!!!"
He's probably coming back. He could actually backup MVS' role with his speed. And he'll be cheap insurance. [Reply]
Originally Posted by htismaqe:
I think the fact that they want to open negotiations at a 2nd rounder suggest they'll take a 3rd or even 4th if they get the right offer.
I’m 100% in for a 4th and probably even a 3rd with a realistic contract. Somewhere I saw a suggestion of a 1st and a 3rd and was hell no. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Balto:
You can't go by what the player did for me but what will the player do for me. IF Veach Brings in Hopkins/OBJ and Reid gives a larger role to Toney and Skyy I believe MVS is wasted Cap.
IF Veach doesn't bring in a expensive FA or trade for one then yes we must keep MVS.
OBJ/Hopkins fill an entirely different role than MVS. They would not be keeping each other off the field. [Reply]