ChiefsPlanet Mobile
Page 203 of 435
« First < 103153193199200201202203 204205206207213253303 > Last »
Patteeu Memorial Political Forum>Sidney Powell: "We're Getting Ready To Overturn Election Results In Multiple States
BanHam 07:04 PM 11-15-2020
Sun, 11/15/2020 - 18:00

Former federal prosecutor Sidney Powell, a Trump campaign lawyer, suggested in a Sunday interview that there is still more evidence coming out in President Donald Trump’s claims of voter fraud and irregularities.

“We’re getting ready to overturn election results in multiple states,” Powell said, saying that she has enough evidence of election fraud to launch a widespread criminal investigation.

“I don’t make comments without having the evidence to back it up,” she added, saying that elections software switched “millions of votes” from Trump to Democratic nominee Joe Biden.

Powell notably provided legal counsel to Gen. Michael Flynn in 2019. She was named to Trump’s legal team in the past several days.

Powell said a whistleblower came forward and said the elections software was designed to “rig elections,” saying that “he saw it happen in other countries,” referring to voting systems Dominion Voting Systems and Smartmatic, or perhaps other software and machines.

“We have so much evidence, I feel like it’s coming in through a fire hose,” Powell said, while noting that she won’t reveal the evidence that she has.

“They can stick a thumb drive in the [voting] machine, they can upload software to it even from the Internet … from Germany or Venezuela even,” she said, adding that operations “can watch votes in real-time” and “can shift votes in real-time,” or alleged bad actors can “remote access anything.”

“We’ve identified mathematically the exact algorithm they’ve used—and planned to use from the beginning” that allegedly switched votes to Biden, Powell remarked.

Powell also made reference to a 2019 investigation from Sens. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), as well as other Democratic lawmakers into Dominion Voting Systems, Election Systems & Software, and Hart InterCivic. The senators had expressed concerns about the security of the voting systems.

“(W)e have concerns about the spread and effect of private equity investment in many sectors of the economy, including the election technology industry—an integral part of our nation’s democratic process,” wrote the lawmakers in their letters to the firms about a year ago.

“These problems threaten the integrity of our elections and demonstrate the importance of election systems that are strong, durable, and not vulnerable to attack.”

Later in the Sunday morning interview, Powell said that her team has “detected voting irregularities that are inexplicable” in states where officials believe they have valid systems.

During the election, Republicans in the House were able to flip at least 11 seats while the GOP is poised to maintain control of the Senate. Some conservatives have questioned how such a voting pattern is possible for Biden to win the presidential election, let alone receive more votes than any other presidential candidate in American history, including President Barack Obama’s victory in 2008.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/trump-...s_3579599.html
[Reply]
mkp785 12:52 PM 12-07-2020
Originally Posted by Trolly McTrollson:
I’m honestly pleasantly surprised that they don’t let you drop N-bombs here.
Its only grudgingly. Its probably mostly due to us having a mixed race QB. If we had drafted trubisky or if Mahomes hadn't won a superbowl- it might be a different story here in SSDC.
[Reply]
Detoxing 12:53 PM 12-07-2020
Originally Posted by BucEyedPea:
That's a filter evasion too.
Pathetic.
[Reply]
BucEyedPea 12:53 PM 12-07-2020
Originally Posted by mkp785:
Its only grudgingly. Its probably mostly due to us having a mixed race QB. If we had drafted trubisky or if Mahomes hadn't won a superbowl- it might be a different story here in SSDC.
You just quoted someone using filter evasion making yourself guilty too.

Like I said, a bunch of copy-cats calling out others doing what you do or want to do, without penalty.
[Reply]
MGRS13 12:56 PM 12-07-2020
Originally Posted by BucEyedPea:
That's why they're using more than one approach—one being appealing to the state legislatures or to get it to congress if it gets tied.
So the people spoke, the courts have spoke, now you are just in favor of a coup. You gonna start calling for Citizens to be Round up and shot soon as well? Maybe just reconditioned to think like you diaper don cultists?
[Reply]
Donger 12:56 PM 12-07-2020
Originally Posted by BucEyedPea:
You just quoted someone using filter evasion making yourself guilty too.

Like I said, a bunch of copy-cats calling out others doing what you do or want to do, without penalty.
Douchebag violation. Reported.
[Reply]
AdolfOliverBush 12:57 PM 12-07-2020
Originally Posted by BucEyedPea:
You just quoted someone using filter evasion making yourself guilty too.

Like I said, a bunch of copy-cats calling out others doing what you do or want to do, without penalty.
And you just replied to someone who quoted someone who used filter evasion, making you guilty too.

DAMMIT! Now I've quoted someone who replied to someone who quoted someone who used filter evasion! We're all guilty!
[Reply]
BucEyedPea 12:57 PM 12-07-2020
Originally Posted by MGRS13:
So the people spoke, the courts have spoke, now you are just in favor of a coup. You gonna start calling for Citizens to be Round up and shot soon as well? Maybe just reconditioned to think like you diaper don cultists?
No a fraudulent election is a coup. Using the Constitution is not. It's preservation of our system and laws. So if it ends up a tie, it does go to congress. And it's not like judges can't be part of any corruption either. Plus there's reports of harrassment and pressure.

Interesting that you think rule of law, our Constitution which protects against fraud is a coup. That's some commie logic. Every illegal vote disinfranchises a legal vote.
[Reply]
BigBeauford 01:00 PM 12-07-2020
Originally Posted by AdolfOliverBush:
And you just replied to someone who quoted someone who used filter evasion, making you guilty too.

DAMMIT! Now I've quoted someone who replied to someone who quoted someone who used filter evasion! We're all guilty!
Welp, thats 2 accounts banned in 24 hours for BEP.
[Reply]
Superturtle 01:01 PM 12-07-2020

[Reply]
AdolfOliverBush 01:02 PM 12-07-2020
Originally Posted by BucEyedPea:
No a fraudulent election is a coup. Using the Constitution is not. It's preservation of our system and laws. So if it ends up a tie, it does go to congress. And it's not like judges can't be part of any corruption either. Plus there's reports of harrassment and pressure.

Interesting that you think rule of law, our Constitution which protects against fraud is a coup. That's some commie logic. Every illegal vote disinfranchises a legal vote.
You must hate the Constitution, because you want the election declared fraudulent, despite a complete lack of evidence, simply because your hero didn't win.
[Reply]
BucEyedPea 01:03 PM 12-07-2020
Originally Posted by AdolfOliverBush:
And you just replied to someone who quoted someone who used filter evasion, making you guilty too.

DAMMIT! Now I've quoted someone who replied to someone who quoted someone who used filter evasion! We're all guilty!
Thank you for telling me that. I edited my post because of you. So it's no longer true.
[Reply]
AdolfOliverBush 01:04 PM 12-07-2020
Originally Posted by BucEyedPea:
Thank you for telling me that. I edited my post because of you. So it's no longer true.
But I quoted someone who replied to someone who quoted someone who used filter evasion, then you quoted me...so you're guilty again.
[Reply]
Donger 01:04 PM 12-07-2020
Ah yes. Our Queen of the Constitution and Police State wanting to overturn an election result based on unproven fraud because her candidate didn't win.
[Reply]
Detoxing 01:05 PM 12-07-2020
Originally Posted by AdolfOliverBush:
You must hate the Constitution, because you want the election declared fraudulent, despite a complete lack of evidence, simply because your hero didn't win.
The Original Framers never intended non-whites to vote therefore this election is a fraud! /BEP
[Reply]
MGRS13 01:06 PM 12-07-2020
Originally Posted by BucEyedPea:
No a fraudulent election is a coup. Using the Constitution is not. It's preservation of our system and laws. So if it ends up a tie, it does go to congress.

Interesting that you think rule of law, our Constitution which protects against fraud is a coup. That's some commie logic. Every illegal vote disinfranchises a legal vote.
The fair election has all ready happened all of the rest of this political theater is an affront to democracy and the sanctity of our elections. Biden is the president elect. He will be inaugurated on 1/20. Just stop this stupid charade. It’s embarrassing the country. YOU LOST. GET OVER IT
[Reply]
Page 203 of 435
« First < 103153193199200201202203 204205206207213253303 > Last »
Up