- Ranked 2nd among charted prospects in success rate vs. man (75%) and press coverage (75.7%) - Led all prospects in success rate vs. zone coverage (88.1%) - He can play inside and outsidehttps://t.co/HbifB61JlJpic.twitter.com/HYsV8rlAzF
4/42 was the kind of game I was expecting from him early in his rookie season. I had him going for 600ish yards as a rookie.
So he's a year behind where I hoped he'd be. That's not the end of the world.
If he manages 650-700 yards this season he's...fine. He's on course to be a solid possession option for a few years before he likely gets layered and we move on.
This kid is going to be just fine. I like what he brings in terms of attitude on the field. He's never going to be a #1, that's Rice IMO, but he can be a great #2 type WR. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Hoover:
This kid is going to be just fine. I like what he brings in terms of attitude on the field. He's never going to be a #1, that's Rice IMO, but he can be a great #2 type WR.
Great #2 receivers go for 1,000 yards and 8 scores. He ain't gonna be that either.
But he can be a very good 3rd option, IMO.
800ish seems like a viable long-term target mark for him.
Again, it's a tools thing. They're just not standout. He's going to do as much as the system allows him to do and once he leaves KC, he's going to fade away in a couple years.
But if he can become a solid 3rd receving option here for 3-4 years before that happens, you just shrug, forget about the opportunity cost and move along. At that point it's just a pretty average 2nd round pick rather than any sort of bust.
Originally Posted by Chief Ten Beers:
Damn, tell me that guy can't run a killer route
A lot of what he does is unnecessary white noise against a quality CB, though. It's needless window dressing that throws the timing off.
But that said, the issue isn't 'can' he run a good route - it's how often he does so. He has to be more consistent and THAT'S what will get him more targets. Especially on timing routes.
That will be such a massive deal for this offense that's so dependent on precise timing. It isn't about him making 6 dekes and finding space on a scramble drill. He needs to do that on time in the offense so we can start looking at him early in the progression and fire it knowing that he's going to be where he needs to be.
That's the development we need to see. A route like that one doesn't really move the needle for me a ton. [Reply]
big picture though - there's a hell of a lot more to WR success than just raw talent (athleticism,) I'd argue instincts as well as free lancing are equally as important, and the last two are where I am finally seeing some growth from week-to-week. [Reply]