O rly
[Reply]

[Reply]

I was kinda impressed with his QB. He was a make it happen kinda guy in that vid. His double pumps fooled the defense and he looked like a make it happen any way you can kind of QB. Anyone know anything about him?
[Reply]

This guy compares to Gronkowski like Stanzi compares to Brady.

Please stop with this shit. If he actually compared to Gronk he wouldn't have been the 4th TE taken.
[Reply]

This did not hold up.
[Reply]

Looks like a balla!
[Reply]

Wow! Deberg got one right. :-)
[Reply]

Deberg don’t miss
[Reply]

Free DeBerg. What even was the reason for his ban?
[Reply]

I’m pretty sure it was for one of the best troll jobs ever.

I know he posted a “Joe Burrow or Patrick Mahomes” thread immediately after we choked away the AFCCG.

I actually thought it was hilarious. He kicked all of us while we were down with his classic gimmick.

Almost like when a sitcom has a character with a lame catch phrase that the character finally uses at the correct time.
[Reply]

Assistant Right Tackle.
[Reply]

Assistant to the Right Tackle.
[Reply]

Great....we've been Kelce'd
[Reply]

Chiefs selected Cincinnati TE Travis Kelce with the No. 63 overall pick.Tony Moeaki may want to start packing his bags. Kelce (6-foot-4 7/8, 255) is a sure-handed receiver and flashed dominant in-line blocking ability for the Bearcats, reminiscent of Heath Miller. He lasted this long due to character concerns; Kelce was suspended for the entire 2010 season for reasons thought to be drug-related. Kelce caught 45 balls for 722 yards (16.0 YPR) and eight touchdowns as a senior. At his April 4 Pro Day, Kelce ran 4.62 with a 37-inch vertical and 10-foot-4 broad jump -- better numbers than both Tyler Eifert and Zach Ertz. A pro-ready blocker, the athletic measurables suggest Kelce could become an elite all-around tight end if his head is on straight. He has an awful lot of long-term fantasy potential.
[Reply]

The funniest part is I bet 99 percent of this board hasn't even seen him play a snap outside of the vid posted in this thread, heh.
[Reply]